## Passage
![[Acts 5.svg]]
# 📖 Comprehensive Scholarly Bible Study & Critical Review: Acts 5
## 🙏 Phase 1: Preliminary Engagement
- **Prayer for Insight:**
_“Lord, grant us honesty in our hearts and boldness in our witness. May we discern Your holiness and obey more than we fear men.”_
- **Reading:**
Acts 5 was read across NRSVUE, AMPC, MSG, TLV, and CJB to capture nuance in judgment language (vv 1–11) and witness exhortations (vv 29–32).
- **Title:**
**“Integrity, Fear, and Obedience in the Early Church”**
- **Key Verses:**
- **v 4**: “You have not lied to men but to God.”
- **v 29**: “We must obey God rather than men.”
---
## 🔍 Phase 2: Observational Analysis
- **Main Themes:**
- Honesty before God vs. hypocrisy
- Divine judgment and communal fear
- Miraculous signs confirming apostolic authority
- Obedience to God in face of persecution
- Pragmatic discernment in Gamaliel’s counsel
- **Characters:**
- **Ananias & Sapphira:** test integrity
- **Peter (Kefa):** mouthpiece of Spirit’s indictment
- **The apostles:** bearers of signs & wonders
- **Sadducees & High Priest:** religious opponents
- **Gamaliel:** voice of wise restraint
- **Events:**
1. Sale deceit and sudden deaths (vv 1–11)
2. Miracles in Solomon’s Portico (vv 12–16)
3. Arrest, angelic jailbreak, early-morning teaching (vv 17–21)
4. Sanhedrin hearing, Gamaliel’s speech, flogging, rejoicing (vv 22–42)
- **Commands/Promises:**
- “Go… and declare… the whole doctrine concerning this Life” (v 20)
- Promise of Holy Spirit witness (v 32)
---
## 📝 Phase 3: Literary and Contextual Analysis
- **Literary Devices:**
- **Rhetorical Questions** (vv 3–4) expose motive
- **Dramatic Irony** in Sapphira’s unawareness (v 7)
- **Repetition** of “fell down and died” (vv 5, 10)
- **Chiasm** framing divine judgment ↔ communal awe
- **Genre:**
Historical narrative of the early church with theological commentary.
- **Context:**
- **Historical:** Jerusalem church c. 30–35 CE, tension with Sadducees
- **Cultural:** Communal sharing ethos meets Greco-Roman patronage norms
- **Canonical:** Follows Acts 4’s unity; prelude to scattered witness (Acts 8)
- **Purpose:** Demonstrate Spirit’s holiness and the Gospel’s unstoppable spread
---
# Acts 5: Detailed Exegesis
## Observation
**Who**
- Ananias and Sapphira
- Peter (Kefa) and the apostles
- Sadducees, high priest, Gamaliel, temple police, the crowd
**What**
- Deceit over land sale, sudden deaths, signs and wonders, imprisonment and miraculous release, Sanhedrin hearing, flogging, perseverance in teaching
**When**
- Immediately after land sale (vv 1–11)
- “About three hours later” (v 7)
- Night jailbreak and next morning teaching (vv 19–21)
- Council meeting shortly thereafter (vv 22–28)
- Daily teaching thereafter (v 42)
**Where**
- In the fellowship’s shared property space (initial offering)
- Solomon’s Portico, Temple precinct (vv 12–16)
- Public jail (vv 18–23)
- Sanhedrin chamber (vv 27–40)
- Homes and Temple courts (v 42)
**Why**
- To maintain community integrity (vv 1–11)
- To confirm apostolic authority (vv 12–16)
- To obey God’s mandate over human restriction (vv 29–32)
**How**
- Divine judgment executed instantly (vv 5, 10)
- Angelic intervention frees apostles (vv 19–20)
- Legal hearing with persuasive counsel (vv 34–40)
---
## Literary Connections
| Device | Term(s) & Verses |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Repetition** | “they fell down and died” (vv 5, 10); “they were filled with jealousy/indignation” (vv 17, 33) |
| **Continuity (synonyms)** | “brought… laid… declared” (offerings/witness: vv 2, 15, 20); “arrested… seized… laid hands” (vv 18, 27) |
| **Contrast (but/however)** | “But Peter said…” (v 3); “But during the night…” (v 19); “But when the officers came…” (v 22) |
| **Comparison (like/as)** | “so that… at least his shadow might fall on some” (v 15); “like… you might even be found…” (v 39) |
| **Cause→Effect** (“when,” “so,” “after”) | “When Ananias heard…” (v 5→death); “So they brought them…” (v 26→no violence) |
| **Effect→Cause** (“because,” “since”) | “They feared the people, because they feared they would be stoned” (v 26) |
| **Means→End** (“so that,” “in order that”)| “so that at least his shadow might fall” (v 15) |
| **Logical Conclusion** (“if… then,” “therefore”) | “For if this movement is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is from God… you may be found fighting God!” (vv 38–39) |
| **General→Particular** | “Many signs and wonders” (v 12) → specific healing of shadow (vv 15–16) |
| **Particular→General** | Healing of individuals (vv 16) → crowds added to the Lord (v 14) |
| **Climax** | Builds from deceit (vv 1–11) → miracles (vv 12–16) → persecution & vindication (vv 17–42) |
| **Introduction/Preparation**| Prayer meeting in Acts 2 analogously prepares community—here implied by “all with one accord” (v 12) |
| **Explanation/Illustration**| Peter’s rhetorical questions illustrate deceit (vv 3–4) |
| **Interrogation (Q&A)** | Peter questions Ananias/Sapphira (vv 3, 8–9); Sanhedrin questions apostles (vv 28) |
---
## Genre, Authorship & Context
- **Genre:** Historical narrative with theological commentary, part of Luke–Acts.
- **Author:** Luke the physician, companion of Paul.
- **Recipients:** Gentile Christian community, under Roman rule, seeking model for mission.
- **Geographical/Cultural:**
- *Solomon’s Portico*: colonnade in Temple courtyard, center for teaching and healing.
- *Sadducees*: priestly party denying resurrection, antagonistic to new movement.
- **Cross-References:**
- Deut 21:22–23 (Jesus on tree, v 30)
- Ezek 18 (individual responsibility, Q1)
- Acts 4:32–37 (earlier communal sharing)
- **Stated Purpose:** Showcase divine endorsement of apostles and necessity of integrity (implied).
- **Tone/Mood:** Dramatic, awe-inspiring, urgent, yet triumphant in faithfulness.
- **Method:** Divine direct action (judgment, miracles, angelic deliverance) coupled with human legal processes (Sanhedrin hearing).
---
## Interpretation
### Key Interpretive Questions
1. **Why did Ananias and Sapphira lie?**
- Clue: Desire for social prestige without full sacrifice (contrast with Barnabas, Acts 4:36–37).
2. **What is the significance of “shadow healings”?**
- Illustrates residual apostolic authority, not magic but faith’s extension.
3. **How does Gamaliel’s test apply today?**
- Encourages evaluating movements by fruit and endurance, not hype.
### Central Meaning
- **Main Point:** God’s holiness demands full integrity, and His work, if genuine, cannot be stopped by human opposition.
- **Original Implication:** Early believers learned that hypocrisy brings divine judgment, while bold obedience brings unstoppable mission.
- **Today’s Implication:**
- **Personal:** Examine motives in giving and witness.
- **Church:** Balance accountability with courageous outreach.
- **Society:** Authentic movements withstand scrutiny and time.
---
## Application
### Meditate On
- **Sin to Repent:** Half-hearted offerings, hypocrisy.
- **Promise to Claim:** “We must obey God rather than men” (v 29).
- **Example to Follow:** Barnabas’s generous giving (contrast Acts 4:37).
- **Error to Avoid:** Testing the Spirit (v 9).
- **Command to Obey:** Proclaim the life-giving doctrine (v 20).
- **Knowledge to Believe:** God vindicates His servants miraculously.
- **Prayer Focus:** Integrity and boldness.
### How Will I Change
- **By God’s Help I Will:** Give sacrificially and authentically in next church offering.
- **I Will Do It:** At Sunday service on ____, with transparent testimony.
- **Accountability Partner:** Ask ____ to check in on my commitment.
- **Acting in Faith:** Organize a neighborhood prayer walk this week based on Hebrews 13:15 promise.
## 🕵️ Phase 4: Interpretive Inquiry (Passage-Focused & Multi-Traditional)
### Question 1: What does the swift judgment on Ananias and Sapphira teach about integrity in the community?
- **Textual Context:**
Judgment serves corrective and didactic aims—establishing fear of God (*phobos*) as foundational.
- **How Various Traditions Interpret This Passage:**
- **Contemporary Voices:**
- *Sam Soleyn (Apostolic/Generational):* Corporate holiness is non-negotiable for divine blessing.
- *Harold Eberle (Partial Preterist/Kingdom Now):* Kingdom ethic demands honesty under the New Covenant.
- *Bill Johnson (Charismatic/Breakthrough):* Spirit-led integrity shows immediate consequences.
- *Joyce Meyer (Practical Evangelical):* Warns against partial obedience; urges full-spectrum giving.
- *United Church of Christ (Liberationist):* Calls for communal accountability and social justice.
- **Jewish Traditions:**
- *Rabbinic Orthodox:* Parallels with Ezekiel 18’s individual responsibility.
- *Karaite:* Direct text reading; strict honesty upheld.
- *Kabbalistic/Hasidic:* Mystical dynamics of *ruach ha-kodesh* offended.
- *Modern Academic:* Socio-economic dimensions of communal sharing highlighted.
- *Messianic:* Foreshadows need for atonement.
- *Qumran/Essenes:* Aligns with sectarian discipline in Dead Sea Scrolls.
- **Christian Schools:**
- *Preterist:* Fulfilled early church mandate; warns modern churches.
- *Historicist:* Typological for all church ages.
- *Futurist/Dispensationalist:* Applies to end-time prophetic compromise.
- *Progressive Dispensationalist:* Transitional judgment pre-kingdom.
- *Idealist:* Symbol of internal Spirit vs. flesh conflict.
- *Critical-Historical:* Luke’s agenda to legitimize apostolic authority.
- *Liberationist:* Critiques judgment narrative’s potential to oppress poor.
- *Patristic/Medieval/Orthodox:* Early fathers saw immediate divine justice.
- *Pentecostal/Charismatic:* Spirit’s power over sin remains relevant.
- **Islamic & Other Faiths:**
- *Classical Sunni/Shi’a:* Analogous to Qur’anic hypocrisy punishments.
- *Islamic apocalyptic motifs:* Warning parallels end-time trials.
- *Ahmadiyya/Baha’i:* Sincerity and unity; secret misdeeds warned against.
- *Honor-Shame Cultures:* Aligns with communal norms of public accountability.
---
### Question 2: How does Gamaliel’s counsel function as a test of divine authenticity?
- **Textual Context:**
Gamaliel cites Theudas and Judas the Galilean—failed uprisings—to argue: if God’s work, unstoppable.
- **How Various Traditions Interpret This Passage:**
- **Contemporary Voices:**
- *Sam Soleyn:* Gamaliel’s restraint displays prophetic wisdom.
- *Harold Eberle:* Early “kingdom-logic” of testing signs and fruits.
- *Bill Johnson:* Discernment gift for leadership validation.
- *Joyce Meyer:* Wait for God’s vindication, avoid hasty judgment.
- *United Church of Christ:* Model of dialogue and fair process.
- **Jewish Traditions:**
- *Rabbinic Orthodox:* Values Sanhedrin debate as Torah tradition.
- *Karaite:* Reliance on written precedent over oral law.
- *Kabbalistic/Hasidic:* Mystical significance in numbers (400, census).
- *Modern Academic:* Rhetorical strategy to prevent factional strife.
- *Messianic:* Acknowledges nascent Messiah movement.
- *Qumran/Essenes:* Contrasts with their strict purity codes.
- **Christian Schools:**
- *Preterist:* Fulfilled in Jewish rejection of apostles.
- *Historicist:* Universal test for new movements’ authenticity.
- *Futurist:* Criterion for end-time prophetic claims.
- *Progressive Dispensationalist:* Shift from Jewish to church context.
- *Idealist:* Symbol of Spirit’s unseen guidance.
- *Critical-Historical:* Gamaliel as Greco-Roman legal influence.
- *Liberationist:* Framework for resisting unjust persecution.
- *Patristic/Medieval/Orthodox:* Example of Christian-secular engagement.
- *Pentecostal/Charismatic:* Validate ministries by signs and wonders.
- **Islamic & Other Faiths:**
- *Sunni/Shi’a:* Islamic *burhān* (evidence) principle before action.
- *Islamic apocalyptic:* Patience before final divine judgment.
- *Ahmadiyya/Baha’i:* Results-based testing of prophecy.
- *Universal Principle:* Verifying spiritual claims globally.
---
### Question 3: What role does “fear” (*phobos*) play in shaping early community dynamics?
- **Textual Context:**
Fear follows judgment (v 11) and appears with miracles (vv 12–13), guiding awe and caution.
- **How Various Traditions Interpret This Passage:**
- **Contemporary Voices:**
- *Sam Soleyn:* Differentiates reverent awe from paralysis.
- *Harold Eberle:* “Fear of the Lord” begins wisdom (Prov. 1:7).
- *Bill Johnson:* Fear fosters dependence on divine power.
- *Joyce Meyer:* Encourages awe over terror.
- *United Church of Christ:* Communal fear as cohesion mechanism.
- **Jewish Traditions:**
- *Rabbinic Orthodox:* *Yirat Adonai* foundational in Proverbs.
- *Karaite:* Rational awe prioritized over emotional dread.
- *Kabbalistic/Hasidic:* Fear reveals divine transcendence.
- *Modern Academic:* Sociological function of fear in sect identity.
- *Messianic:* Links fear motif with Messianic hope.
- *Qumran/Essenes:* Fear as discipline in communal rule.
- **Christian Schools:**
- *Preterist:* Fear as prophetic transition marker.
- *Historicist:* Cyclical application across church history.
- *Futurist:* Hallmark of end-time events.
- *Progressive Dispensationalist:* Balances fear with future hope.
- *Idealist:* Symbol of moral accountability.
- *Critical-Historical:* Luke’s rhetorical use to underscore seriousness.
- *Liberationist:* Warns fear may stifle prophetic critique.
- *Orthodox (Patristic):* Integrates fear into sacramental awe.
- *Pentecostal:* Cultivates reverent worship atmosphere.
- **Islamic & Other Faiths:**
- *Sunni/Shi’a:* *Taqwa* (God-consciousness) parallel.
- *Islamic apocalyptic:* Fear preludes final judgment.
- *Ahmadiyya/Baha’i:* Prioritizes reverence over dread.
- *Global:* Fear linked to moral integrity across cultures.
---
### Question 4: In what ways can Acts 5 inform modern practices of church discipline and witness?
- **Textual Context:**
Integrity (vv 1–11) and outreach (vv 17–42) form a unified strategy.
- **How Various Traditions Interpret This Passage:**
- **Contemporary Voices:**
- *Sam Soleyn:* Robust accountability structures in congregations.
- *Harold Eberle:* Pair kingdom proclamation with ethical practice.
- *Bill Johnson:* Combine miraculous ministry with moral rigor.
- *Joyce Meyer:* Clearly communicate consequences of hypocrisy.
- *United Church of Christ:* Emphasize restorative justice models.
- **Jewish Traditions:**
- *Rabbinic Orthodox:* Balance *din* (justice) and *rachamim* (mercy).
- *Karaite:* Textual fidelity in governance.
- *Kabbalistic/Hasidic:* Mystical accountability practices.
- *Modern Academic:* Synagogue discipline parallels.
- *Messianic:* Fuse Jewish purity codes with Gospel witness.
- *Qumran/Essenes:* Strict boundary maintenance alongside outreach.
- **Christian Schools:**
- *Preterist:* Teach discipline as fulfilled early mandate.
- *Historicist:* Recognize cycles of discipline and renewal.
- *Futurist:* Apply cautionary principle to end-time assemblies.
- *Progressive Dispensationalist:* Advocate phased correction plus mission.
- *Idealist:* Inner purification metaphor for all believers.
- *Critical-Historical:* Luke’s aim to legitimize missionary expansion.
- *Liberationist:* Discipline empowering marginalized voices.
- *Patristic/Medieval/Orthodox:* Employ conciliar canons for correction.
- *Pentecostal/Charismatic:* Spirit-empowered accountability and evangelism.
- **Islamic & Other Faiths:**
- *Sunni/Shi’a:* Parallels to *shūrā* (consultation) and community correction.
- *Islamic apocalyptic:* Moral correction preceding eschatological hope.
- *Ahmadiyya/Baha’i:* Consultation plus ethical guidance.
- *Global:* Community care and witness principles cross-culturally.
---
## 🧠 Common Fallacies in Interpreting Acts 5 (with Specific Examples)
1. **Presentism**
- *Example:* Critiquing Ananias’s death as human rights abuse ignores covenantal context of covenant purity.
2. **Confirmation Bias**
- *Example:* Using v 29 to justify civil disobedience while ignoring communal accountability in vv 1–11.
3. **Eisegesis vs. Exegesis**
- *Example:* Forcing prosperity-gospel reading onto shadow healings rather than accepting Luke’s demonstration of divine authority.
4. **Over-literalism**
- *Example:* Expecting all congregations to replicate shadow healings misses narrative purpose of affirming apostolic power.
5. **Cherry Picking**
- *Example:* Emphasizing v 11’s fear to promote fear-based leadership, ignoring joy and empowerment in vv 41–42.
6. **False Equivalence**
- *Example:* Equating Ananias’s partial giving to modern corporate fraud fails to account for voluntary communal sharing ethos.
7. **Anachronism**
- *Example:* Interpreting Holy Spirit activity as group hypnosis ignores Jewish pneumatology.
8. **Slippery Slope**
- *Example:* Claiming minor ethical lapses always lead to schism overlooks varied historical disciplinary outcomes.
---
## 🧩 How Fallacies Distort Interpretation and Application
- **Presentism**: Dismisses formative communal norms.
- **Confirmation Bias**: Creates echo chambers, neglecting full ethical demands.
- **Eisegesis**: Undermines scriptural authority.
- **Over-literalism**: Trivializes narrative richness.
- **Cherry Picking**: Weakens cohesive theology.
- **False Equivalence**: Obscures context specificity.
- **Anachronism**: Confuses pneumatological understanding.
- **Slippery Slope**: Incites undue fear, hampers nuanced pastoral care.
---
## 🌍 Implications for Theological Discourse & Further Research
- Comparative studies of communal discipline across faiths
- Archaeological investigation of Solomon’s Portico gatherings
- Psychological research on *phobos* in group identity formation
---
## 📈 Areas for Further Expansion
- Ethics and models of church discipline
- Cross-cultural hermeneutics
- Gender and power dynamics in early assemblies
- Spiritual formation and leadership development
---
## 📚 References & Recommended Reading
- Longenecker, R. N. _The Ethics of the Early Church_
- Witherington, B. _Issues in the Book of Acts_
- D’Angelo, M. _Charismatic Holiness in Acts_
- Sanders, E. P. _The Historical Figure of Jesus_
- Ladd, G. E. _A Theology of the New Testament_
# 🕒 1-Hour Bible Study Plan: Acts 5
> **Theme:** Integrity, Fear, and Obedience in the Early Church
> **Passage:** Acts 5:1–42
> **Goal:** Participants will grasp how integrity and divine authenticity shaped the first church—and how to live that out today.
---
## ⏱️ Session Breakdown
| Time | Segment |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------|
| 0–5 min | Welcome & Opening Prayer |
| 5–15 min | Context & Reading |
| 15–30 min | Q1 Discussion: Integrity & Judgment |
| 30–45 min | Q2–3 Combined: Authenticity & Fear |
| 45–55 min | Q4 Discussion: Discipline & Witness |
| 55–60 min | Wrap-Up, Applications & Closing Prayer |
---
## 🙏 0–5 Minutes: Welcome & Opening Prayer
1. **Greet everyone** warmly.
2. **Pray for insight**, echoing our preparatory phrase:
> “Lord, give us truth and courage. May Your Spirit lead our hearts as we study Your Word.”
---
## 📖 5–15 Minutes: Context & Reading
1. **Brief Context** (2 min)
- Luke wrote Acts c. 80 CE to show the Spirit’s unstoppable spread through integrity and bold witness.
2. **Read Aloud** (5 min)
- Assign four readers for vv 1–11, 12–16, 17–21, 22–42.
3. **Observational Check** (3 min)
- Invite a couple of volunteers to name a key theme or striking image (e.g. “fear,” “shadow healings,” “jailbreak”).
---
## 🤝 15–30 Minutes: Q1 Discussion—Integrity & Judgment
### ❓ Question
> **What does God’s swift judgment on Ananias and Sapphira teach us about integrity in our community?**
### 🔍 Discussion Prompts
- **Spot the Contrast:** How does Peter expose their hypocrisy? (vv 3–4)
- **Feel the Fear:** What does “fell down and died” do for communal awe? (vv 5, 11)
- **Modern Parallel:** How might partial obedience manifest in our group?
### 📝 Activity
- **Small Groups (3–4 people):**
- Identify one modern scenario where “lying to God” could occur in church life.
- Suggest a corrective step that balances grace and accountability.
---
## 🤔 30–45 Minutes: Q2–Q3 Combined—Authenticity & Fear
### ❓ Question 2
> **How does Gamaliel’s counsel test divine authenticity?**
### ❓ Question 3
> **What role does “fear” play in shaping early community dynamics?**
### 🔍 Discussion Prompts
- **Historical Wisdom:** Why did Gamaliel cite Theudas and Judas? (vv 36–39)
- **Test of Time:** What criteria do we use today to verify a movement’s authenticity?
- **Healthy Awe vs. Paralysis:** How can we cultivate *phobos* as reverence, not terror?
### 📝 Activity
- **Interactive Poll:**
- Write two columns on flipchart: *Signs of God’s work* vs. *False indicators*.
- Have groups list examples under each, then compare with Gamaliel’s logic.
---
## 🌱 45–55 Minutes: Q4 Discussion—Discipline & Witness
### ❓ Question
> **In what ways can Acts 5 inform our practices of church discipline and bold witness today?**
### 🔍 Discussion Prompts
- **Unified Strategy:** How do vv 1–11 (integrity) and vv 17–42 (outreach) form a single vision?
- **Restorative vs. Punitive:** Which approach aligns best with Jesus’ heart?
- **Shadow Healing Today:** What “shadow” of Christ might we cast in our neighborhoods?
### 📝 Activity
- **Action Brainstorm:**
- List one practical discipline (accountability covenant, confession time) and one evangelistic step (prayer walk, neighborhood outreach) your group will adopt this week.
---
## 🙌 55–60 Minutes: Wrap-Up & Closing Prayer
1. **Recap** three takeaways:
- Integrity honors God.
- Authenticity withstands testing.
- Fear of the Lord fosters wise mission.
2. **Personal Commitment:** Invite each person to share one application in one sentence.
3. **Closing Prayer:**
> “Father, we ask for integrity that reflects Your holiness, discernment like Gamaliel’s, and healthy awe that propels us into bold witness. Amen.”
---
## 📚 Resources & Handouts
- **Handout PDF:** Key verses, discussion questions, and action steps.
- **Recommended Reading:**
- Witherington, _Issues in the Book of Acts_
- Longenecker, _The Ethics of the Early Church_
---
🔗 **Next Session Preview:**
**Topic:** “Spirit-Empowered Community in Acts 2” — explore communal worship and shared resources.
# Text Elements
Text ^rGR4VqSM
%%
# Drawing
```json
{
"type": "excalidraw",
"version": 2,
"source": "https://github.com/zsviczian/obsidian-excalidraw-plugin/releases/tag/2.1.4",
"elements": [
{
"id": "rGR4VqSM",
"type": "text",
"x": -149.9439697265625,
"y": -231.19235229492188,
"width": 49.55995178222656,
"height": 25,
"angle": 0,
"strokeColor": "#1e1e1e",
"backgroundColor": "transparent",
"fillStyle": "solid",
"strokeWidth": 2,
"strokeStyle": "solid",
"roughness": 1,
"opacity": 100,
"groupIds": [],
"frameId": null,
"roundness": null,
"seed": 568898042,
"version": 5,
"versionNonce": 196968358,
"isDeleted": false,
"boundElements": null,
"updated": 1713808738313,
"link": null,
"locked": false,
"text": "Text",
"rawText": "Text",
"fontSize": 20,
"fontFamily": 1,
"textAlign": "left",
"verticalAlign": "top",
"containerId": null,
"originalText": "Text",
"lineHeight": 1.25
}
],
"appState": {
"theme": "light",
"viewBackgroundColor": "#ffffff",
"currentItemStrokeColor": "#1e1e1e",
"currentItemBackgroundColor": "transparent",
"currentItemFillStyle": "solid",
"currentItemStrokeWidth": 2,
"currentItemStrokeStyle": "solid",
"currentItemRoughness": 1,
"currentItemOpacity": 100,
"currentItemFontFamily": 1,
"currentItemFontSize": 20,
"currentItemTextAlign": "left",
"currentItemStartArrowhead": null,
"currentItemEndArrowhead": "arrow",
"scrollX": 504,
"scrollY": 428.3359375,
"zoom": {
"value": 1
},
"currentItemRoundness": "round",
"gridSize": null,
"gridColor": {
"Bold": "#C9C9C9FF",
"Regular": "#EDEDEDFF"
},
"currentStrokeOptions": null,
"previousGridSize": null,
"frameRendering": {
"enabled": true,
"clip": true,
"name": true,
"outline": true
}
},
"files": {}
}
```
%%