Editor components updates in WordPress 7.1 ![rw-book-cover](https://s.w.org/images/home/wordpress-default-ogimage.png) ๐Ÿ”— **Source:** [Editor components updates in WordPress 7.1](https://make.wordpress.org/core/2026/07/23/editor-components-updates-in-wordpress-7-1/) > [!note]+ Document Notes > tags: [wordpress-7-1, gutenberg, wordpress-components, design-systems, plugin-development] > author: WordPress Core contributors > source: Make WordPress Core > reference: https://make.wordpress.org/core/2026/07/23/editor-components-updates-in-wordpress-7-1/ > date created: > > # ๐Ÿท๏ธ Title: Editor components updates in WordPress 7.1 > <!-- deep-read:sections start --> ## ๐Ÿงญ Table of Contents - [๐Ÿ“ Summary](#-summary) - [๐Ÿ“– Main Content](#-main-content) - [๐Ÿ—’๏ธ Notes](#๏ธ-notes) - [๐Ÿ“š References](#-references) - [๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Paraphrase](#๏ธ-paraphrase) - [๐Ÿ“ฐ Newsletter](#-newsletter) - [โœ… Action Items](#-action-items) - [๐Ÿงช Hypotheses](#-hypotheses) - [๐Ÿ“Š Methodology](#-methodology) - [โ“ Questions](#-questions) - [๐Ÿ”ฎ Future Research](#-future-research) - [๐Ÿ’ก Implications](#-implications) - [๐Ÿง  Learning Styles Assessment](#-learning-styles-assessment) - [๐Ÿ“Š Accessibility Assessment](#-accessibility-assessment) - [๐ŸŒ DEIB Assessment](#-deib-assessment) - [โœ… Logical Validity](#-logical-validity) - [๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ DARVO Analysis](#-darvo-analysis) - [๐ŸŽฏ Conclusion](#-conclusion) - [๐Ÿ”„ Refactor Appendix](#-refactor-appendix--editor-components-updates-in-wordpress-71) - [๐Ÿงฐ Template Library](#-template-library) ### ๐Ÿ”— References - [Editor components updates in WordPress 7.1](https://make.wordpress.org/core/2026/07/23/editor-components-updates-in-wordpress-7-1/) - [40px component-size tracking issue](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/65751) - [Emotion-to-SCSS tracking issue](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/66806) - [Navigation removal](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/78529) - [Experimental utility removal](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/78528) ## ๐Ÿ“ Summary - WordPress 7.1 makes 40px the unconditional default height for a broad set of form controls. The former opt-in prop no longer changes runtime behavior. - The components package starts moving Emotion-based styles to SCSS modules. Consumers that passed Emotion's `css` prop to `View` or relied on fragment order need to adjust. - The deprecated `Navigation` component and `__experimentalApplyValueToSides` utility are removed after warnings that began in WordPress 6.8. - Plugin, theme, and block developers are the main stakeholders. The key risk is silent visual or cascade changes in extensions that depended on old opt-outs or Emotion behavior. - Bottom line: extension authors should remove obsolete props, replace `Navigation` with `Navigator`, and test component styling against WordPress 7.1. ## ๐Ÿ“– Main Content - **Form-control sizing:** Affected controls now render at 40px. Passing `__next40pxDefaultSize`, including `false`, does nothing. A few controls also ignore their deprecated `size` prop. `Button` remains outside this change and still uses its own opt-in prop. - **Styling migration:** `View` keeps the `css` prop only for type compatibility; it no longer applies styles. Use `style` or `className`. When Emotion fragments depend on source order, compose them within one `css()` call before combining classes with `cx()`. - **API removals:** `Navigation` is gone in favor of `Navigator`. `__experimentalApplyValueToSides` is gone, while `BoxControl` remains available. - **Release pattern:** The post shows staged compatibility work: early opt-in, console warnings, deprecation, then removal. That gives maintainers time to test while letting Core finish a design-system migration. - **Uncertainty:** The post says the Emotion migration will expand, but it does not list every future component or a final completion release. ## ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ Notes - The 40px change covers many controls from `@wordpress/components` and four typography controls from `@wordpress/block-editor`. - Removing `__next40pxDefaultSize={ false }` closes the escape hatch to the former 36px height. - `Button` is an explicit exception, so automated cleanup must not remove its opt-in prop without checking current behavior. - The `View` change can fail quietly because the prop remains accepted by types while doing nothing at runtime. - CSS shorthand, longhand, and nested-selector order can change when separate Emotion fragments are passed through `cx()`. - The removal schedule gives a concrete test case for whether deprecation warnings reach extension maintainers before code disappears. ## ๐Ÿ“š References - [Make WordPress Core dev note](https://make.wordpress.org/core/2026/07/23/editor-components-updates-in-wordpress-7-1/) - [Gutenberg issue 65751](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/65751) - [Gutenberg issue 66806](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/issues/66806) - [Gutenberg PR 78529](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/78529) - [Gutenberg PR 78528](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/78528) ## ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Paraphrase - WordPress finishes the form-control sizing migration begun in 6.7 and 6.8. Developers no longer opt into 40px controls or opt back out to 36px. - Core is replacing Emotion internals with SCSS modules. Most extensions should not notice, but code tied to Emotion's runtime or cascade behavior must move to ordinary styles and classes. - Two APIs that carried deprecation warnings since 6.8 now disappear. Developers must use their documented replacements or remove obsolete calls. - The post is a migration checklist, not a broad product announcement: search your extension code, update the named APIs, then test visual behavior. ## ๐Ÿ“ฐ Newsletter WordPress 7.1 finishes several component migrations that have been warning developers since 6.8. Form controls settle at 40px, `View` stops honoring Emotion's `css` prop, and the old `Navigation` component exits in favor of `Navigator`. The practical move is simple: search your plugin or theme for the named props and APIs, remove the dead paths, and run a visual regression pass. [Read the full dev note](https://make.wordpress.org/core/2026/07/23/editor-components-updates-in-wordpress-7-1/). ## โœ… Action Items #### DevRel - Publish a before-and-after migration guide and track extension questions by component. - Run an office hour for plugin and theme developers with real code examples. - Add copyable search commands for deprecated props and imports. - Measure guide use through clicks, support questions, and resolved compatibility reports. #### OSPO - Add the removed APIs to internal WordPress dependency inventories. - Confirm license and provenance records for copied component examples. - Route compatibility findings upstream with reproducible cases. - Track which maintained products still depend on Emotion-specific behavior. #### Community - Maintainers: test supported extensions on a WordPress 7.1 build. - Contributors: submit focused documentation or migration fixes. - Sponsors: fund compatibility testing and issue triage. - Ecosystem: share breakage reports with exact component names and screenshots. #### WordPress - Core: keep removal notes tied to replacement guidance and release criteria. - Core Performance: measure CSS payload and runtime effects from the SCSS migration. - Core AI: ensure code assistants stop suggesting removed props and APIs. - Core Program Team: track cross-package migration dependencies and unresolved dev-note gaps. - Mobile: confirm shared component assumptions do not leak into app interfaces. - Playground: publish a 7.1 compatibility sandbox for extension testing. - Community: include the change in developer-focused WordCamp materials. - Training: update component-development lessons. - Marketing: avoid presenting internal migration work as a user-facing redesign. - Support: prepare a short diagnostic for broken control sizing. - Design: verify 40px controls across density, state, and layout cases. - Documentation: update package references and migration examples. - Photos: no direct action; verify contributor tools if they use affected controls. - TV: caption and index any migration walkthrough. - Polyglots: translate user-facing strings only; code identifiers stay unchanged. - Accessibility: test target size, focus visibility, and zoom behavior. - Meta: scan WordPress.org interfaces using the affected packages. - CLI: consider a command or documented grep recipe for deprecated symbols. - Hosting: add extension compatibility checks to 7.1 staging guidance. - Tide: flag removed imports only when the scan can avoid false positives. - Openverse: test any shared WordPress component surfaces. - Themes: update theme-author guidance for component overrides. - Plugins: alert authors whose code still contains removed symbols. #### The WPOCC - Fund a short compatibility clinic and publish the resulting migration examples. - Support maintainers who need test coverage for component changes. ### FAIR - Record component-version requirements in package metadata. - Keep migration guidance portable across distribution channels. - Publish decision records for compatibility policy and sunset timing. ## ๐Ÿงช Hypotheses - Extensions that heeded WordPress 6.8 console warnings show fewer 7.1 regressions than extensions that did not. - Removing Emotion from components reduces client-side styling overhead without increasing CSS conflicts. - Keeping the `css` prop in types while making it a no-op causes more silent failures than a compile-time removal would. - A machine-readable deprecation list reduces time-to-fix for plugin authors. ### ๐Ÿ“Š Methodology - Scan a representative plugin and theme sample for the named props, imports, and utilities. - Run visual regression tests on WordPress 7.0 and 7.1 with matched content and viewports. - Compare support tickets, console warnings, and fix times before and after release. - Measure CSS size, style insertion time, and cascade differences for migrated components. ### โ“ Questions - When will `Button` complete its 40px migration? - Which components move from Emotion next, and how will authors receive notice? - Should a no-op prop remain in types, or should types force migration? - Can Core publish a structured deprecation feed for extension tooling? ### ๐Ÿ”ฎ Future Research - Test whether staged deprecation warnings reach maintainers who do not run development builds. - Compare source-order behavior across Emotion, SCSS modules, and mixed extension styles. - Study whether automated codemods can remove the old sizing prop without touching the `Button` exception. ### ๐Ÿ’ก Implications - **Practice:** extension teams need code search plus visual testing, not code search alone. - **Policy:** removals work best when warnings, replacements, and dates are easy to query. - **Security:** no direct security change, though dead compatibility code can hide untested paths. - **Education:** examples should teach the difference between accepted types and active runtime behavior. - **Funding:** shared compatibility labs would reduce duplicate testing across small maintainers. ### ๐Ÿง  Learning Styles Assessment - Reading level estimate: Flesch-Kincaid grade 11โ€“13, based on technical vocabulary and long component lists. #### ๐Ÿ‘€ Visual learners - Present: code identifiers and one composition example. - Improve: add before-and-after screenshots and a component matrix. #### ๐Ÿ”Š Aural learners - Present: not applicable; this is a text dev note. - Improve: add a short narrated migration summary. #### ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Verbal learners - Present: direct replacement instructions. - Improve: define Emotion, SCSS modules, cascade order, and no-op. #### ๐Ÿงฉ Kinesthetic learners - Present: actionable removal and replacement steps. - Improve: provide a Playground lab with a deliberately broken extension. #### ๐Ÿง  Logical learners - Present: clear version sequence and API mapping. - Improve: add a decision table for each deprecated symbol. #### ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿคโ€๐Ÿง‘ Social learners - Present: issue and pull-request links. - Improve: add an office-hour prompt and peer testing checklist. #### ๐Ÿง˜โ€โ™€๏ธ Solitary learners - Present: enough detail for self-paced migration. - Improve: add a self-check quiz and completion checklist. #### ๐ŸŒฟ Naturalistic learners - Present: not applicable; the source has no environmental frame. - Improve: note any build-size or runtime-efficiency effects once measured. ### ๐Ÿ“Š Accessibility Assessment #### Screen reader semantics - The source uses headings, lists, code, and links. Link labels made only of issue numbers need surrounding context. #### Keyboard navigation - The article is primarily static. Confirm code samples and tables do not create focus traps. #### Contrast and readability - Long identifier lists are dense. Use row grouping and sufficient code contrast. #### Text resizing and reflow - The side-by-side code table should reflow at 200% zoom without horizontal loss. #### Media and captions - Not applicable; no time-based media appears in the captured article. #### Forms and interactions - Not applicable; the article contains no forms beyond site navigation. #### Standards reference - Check WCAG 2.2 AA criteria 1.3.1, 1.4.10, 2.4.4, and 2.4.6. ### ๐ŸŒ DEIB Assessment #### Cultural breadth - The guidance is globally applicable but only in English. #### Inclusive language - The tone is neutral and role-focused. #### Neurodiversity support - Headings help scanning; the long component list raises cognitive load. #### Representation - No people or case studies are represented beyond contributor credit. #### Psychological safety - The post avoids blame and gives direct migration steps. ### โœ… Logical Validity #### Strong reasoning - The post uses a clear change-to-action pattern: it names behavior, scope, exception, and replacement. - Version history supports the claim that maintainers received an opt-in and warning period before removal. #### Fallacies - No material fallacy is present. The claim that most consumers need no change would be stronger with compatibility-test data. #### Tone of voice - Precise, procedural, and restrained. The post distinguishes final behavior from exceptions and future work. ### ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ DARVO Analysis - Deny: not applicable; the source does not deny a reported harm. - Attack: not applicable; it does not target critics or maintainers. - Reverse victim/offender: not applicable; no conflict frame appears. ## ๐ŸŽฏ Conclusion WordPress 7.1 completes several component migrations after a staged warning period. Developers should remove obsolete sizing props, replace `Navigation`, stop depending on `View`'s Emotion `css` behavior, and test the visual cascade. The main follow-up is a 7.1 compatibility run against maintained plugins, themes, and WordPress.org interfaces. ## ๐Ÿ”„ Refactor Appendix โ€” Editor components updates in WordPress 7.1 ### ๐Ÿ“š Literature Atoms ### [H1] Form controls adopt 40px unconditionally > [!quote] ID:rw_1036798918 > Starting in WordPress 7.1, @wordpress/components form controls use a 40px default height unconditionally. **Context & use**: - Opening change summary. - Use when tracking design-system defaults and extension compatibility. **Tags**: #xref **Highlight**: [view highlight](readwise://open/1036798918) <!-- atomicity: 1 idea โœ“ --> ### [H2] View stops applying Emotion css > [!quote] ID:rw_1036798919 > View still accepts the legacy css prop for type compatibility, but it is now a no-op. **Context & use**: - Emotion migration section. - Use when separating type compatibility from runtime compatibility. **Tags**: #xref #articleseed **Highlight**: [view highlight](readwise://open/1036798919) <!-- atomicity: 1 idea โœ“ --> ### [H3] Deprecation ends in API removal > [!quote] ID:rw_1036798920 > The component has been deprecated since WordPress 6.8. Use the Navigator component instead. **Context & use**: - Navigation removal section. - Use as a release-policy example of warning, replacement, and removal. **Tags**: #xref **Highlight**: [view highlight](readwise://open/1036798920) <!-- atomicity: 1 idea โœ“ --> ### ๐Ÿง  Permanent Candidates #### [P1] Type compatibility does not guarantee runtime compatibility **Claim**: An accepted prop can still be operationally dead. **Evidence pointer**: [[#H2]] **Scope & conditions**: Applies when libraries retain types during staged migrations; breaks when runtime and types are removed together. **Links**: - [[Deprecation policy]] โ€” because extends staged API retirement. - [[Visual regression testing]] โ€” because applies-in component migrations. - [[Compatibility contracts]] โ€” because contrasts compile-time acceptance with runtime behavior. <!-- atomicity: 1 idea โœ“ --> ### โœ๏ธ Fleeting Queue - [F1] Check maintained WordPress extensions for the four removed or ignored symbols โ€” source dev note #xref. ### โ†’ Things 3 - [ ] Run a 7.1 code search and visual test on maintained extensions โ€” WordPress compatibility #things <!-- deep-read:sections end --> ๐Ÿ“„ **Full text:** [[Full Document Contents/Articles/Editor components updates in WordPress 7.1.md|Editor components updates in WordPress 7.1 by WordPress Core contributors]] ## Highlights - Starting in WordPress 7.1, `@wordpress/components` form controls use a 40px default height unconditionally. The opt-in `__next40pxDefaultSize` prop is no longer needed and has no runtime effect when passed. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01ky7rk8mnt4n1za04vpbdrf1d)) - Note: The 40px form-control migration becomes the unconditional default. - Tags: wordpress-components, atom/literature/h1 - Starting in WordPress 7.1, the deprecated `Navigation` component and its subcomponents are removed from `@wordpress/components` ([#78529](https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/78529)). ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01ky7rkax4avq0684et1baykxn)) - Note: A two-release deprecation window ends in removal. - Tags: wordpress-components, atom/literature/h2