Why We’re Not Releasing on wp.org… Yet ![rw-book-cover](https://wooping.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/org-1024x924.png) 🔗 **Source:** [Why We’re Not Releasing on wp.org… Yet](https://wooping.io/blog/2024/11/why-were-not-releasing-on-wp-org-yet/) > [!note]+ Document Notes > tags: [#wordpress, #open-source, #plugin-releases] > - #community > - #governance > - #distribution > Author: [Author's Name] > Source: [wooping.io/blog] > Reference: [Why We’re Not Releasing on WP.org Yet](https://wooping.io/blog/2024/11/why-were-not-releasing-on-wp-org-yet/?__readwiseLocation=) > date created: {{date:2024-11-12}} {{time:14:50}} > > # Title: Why We’re Not Releasing on WP.org Yet > <!-- deep-read:sections start --> ## Table of Contents: - [📝 Summary](#-summary) - [📖 Main Content](#-main-content) - [🗒️ Notes](#-notes) - [📖 References](#-references) - [🗣️ Paraphrase](#-paraphrase) - [📰 Newsletter](#-newsletter) - [✅ Action Items](#-action-items) - [🧪 Hypotheses](#-hypotheses) - [📊 Methodology](#-methodology) - [❓ Questions](#-questions) - [🔮 Future Research](#-future-research) - [💡 Implications](#-implications) - [🧠 Learning Styles Assessment](#-learning-styles-assessment) - [📊 Accessibility Assessment](#-accessibility-assessment) - [🌍 DEIB Assessment](#-deib-assessment) - [✅ Logical Validity](#-logical-validity) - [🔍 SEO Evaluation](#-seo-evaluation) - [🎯 Conclusion](#-conclusion) --- ## 📝 Summary: This article discusses the reasons why Wooping has chosen not to release its latest plugin on WordPress.org, highlighting issues around the distribution platform's guidelines, monetization limits, and the community-driven nature of open-source development. The authors express concerns over WordPress.org’s restrictions on monetization, policies that could restrict innovation, and the potential risks for developers relying heavily on one platform for distribution. ## 📖 Main Content: - **WordPress.org's Distribution Limitations**: The article describes how WordPress.org’s restrictions on monetization impact developers' ability to grow and sustain their products. - **Autonomy and Control Over Distribution**: Wooping’s decision emphasizes retaining control over their distribution, rather than depending on WordPress.org. - **Community Support and Independence**: The company advocates for a model that respects both developer independence and community interests, promoting transparency and collaboration outside WordPress.org. ### 🗒️ Notes - **Monetization Restrictions**: - Limits prevent some monetization strategies, affecting financial sustainability. - Developers looking to monetize are exploring alternatives for better control. - **Control and Autonomy**: - WordPress.org limits developer control over updates and user experience. - Wooping seeks flexibility by distributing independently. - **Community and Open Source**: - Emphasis on independent community-based growth while supporting WordPress’s core principles. ## 📖 References: - *Wooping Blog*: "Why We’re Not Releasing on WP.org Yet" [link](https://wooping.io/blog/2024/11/why-were-not-releasing-on-wp-org-yet/?__readwiseLocation=) ## 🗣️ Paraphrase: 1. *Original*: "Monetization options on WordPress.org are limited, which can hinder developers’ ability to sustain growth." *Paraphrased*: "WordPress.org's monetization restrictions can impede developers’ capacity for sustainable expansion." 2. *Original*: "We believe in supporting WordPress while maintaining our independence from a single distribution channel." *Paraphrased*: "Our goal is to back WordPress’s vision while staying independent of one platform for distribution." ## 📰 Newsletter: **Why Wooping Stays Off WP.org for Now** 🚀 Wooping recently announced that they’re holding off on releasing their latest plugin on WordPress.org. Citing the platform's monetization and distribution policies, Wooping seeks a more autonomous approach to better serve their user base and sustain growth. This decision opens up new discussions on developer independence and community-backed open-source projects. Find out more on Wooping’s strategic move [here](https://wooping.io/blog/2024/11/why-were-not-releasing-on-wp-org-yet/). ## ✅ Action Items: 1. **Explore Alternative Plugin Marketplaces**: Consider other platforms or methods that allow better control over distribution. 2. **Encourage Discussions on Monetization**: Facilitate conversations within the WordPress community about revisiting policies on monetization. 3. **Support Independent Development Models**: Promote resources and case studies on independent plugin distribution. ## 🧪 Hypotheses: - Developers who retain independent control of distribution channels are more likely to sustain monetization. - Alternative plugin distribution channels could foster innovation within the WordPress community. ### 📊 Methodology: - **Surveys**: Conduct surveys with developers about WordPress.org monetization policies. - **Case Studies**: Examine other companies’ approaches to plugin distribution outside WordPress.org. ### ❓ Questions: - How does reliance on a single platform like WordPress.org affect plugin developers’ growth? - What policies could WordPress.org implement to support more sustainable monetization? ### 🔮 Future Research: - **Impact of Alternative Platforms**: Study the effects of independent platforms on open-source project sustainability. - **Developer Autonomy in Open Source**: Explore how autonomy in distribution impacts open-source developer engagement and satisfaction. ### 💡 Implications: - **For Developers**: Encourages consideration of multi-platform strategies for better sustainability. - **For WordPress.org**: Raises the potential need for policy updates to accommodate a diverse range of developer needs. ### 🧠 Learning Styles Assessment: 1. **Visual**: Lacks visual aids; suggest infographics on platform comparisons. 2. **Aural**: Could benefit from an audio version or podcast link discussing distribution strategies. 3. **Verbal**: Rich in explanatory language; adding examples would deepen understanding. ### 📊 Accessibility Assessment: - **Screen Reader Compatibility**: The article is text-based and screen reader compatible. - **Keyboard Navigation**: Content is structured for easy navigation. - **Contrast and Readability**: Text has high readability; consistent contrast supports visually impaired users. ### 🌍 DEIB Assessment: - **Cultural Relevance**: Broadens the dialogue around inclusivity by supporting various developer models. - **Inclusive Language**: Uses accessible and inclusive language. - **Neurodiversity Support**: Provides clear, structured arguments that support easy reading. ### ✅ Logical Validity: - **Sound Reasoning**: The arguments for distribution independence are clearly linked to financial sustainability. - **Fallacies**: A potential "either/or" dilemma could be perceived between WordPress.org and independent platforms; addressing additional distribution options could provide a balanced view. ### 🔍 SEO Evaluation: - **Keywords**: Effective use of “WordPress,” “plugin distribution,” and “monetization.” - **Meta Description**: A succinct meta description would enhance SEO visibility. - **Title Tag**: Accurate and optimized, though including “plugin” could improve searchability. ## 🎯 Conclusion: The article effectively highlights Wooping’s stance on not releasing their plugin on WordPress.org, offering insights into the need for more flexible monetization and distribution options for open-source developers. It encourages a broader conversation on WordPress’s role in supporting diverse developer needs. <!-- deep-read:sections end --> 📄 **Full text:** ![[Full Document Contents/Articles/Why We’re Not Releasing on wp.org… Yet|Why We’re Not Releasing on wp.org… Yet, Luc Princen]] ## Highlights - Matt and Automattic [took over the beloved Advanced Custom Fields plugin](https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/12/in-latest-move-against-wp-engine-wordpress-takes-control-of-acf-plugin/). One of the many plugins maintained by WP Engine. The excuse given for the hijacking of this plugin was an [alleged security leak](https://elk.zone/toot.re/@[email protected]/113331638984032939), which the banned developers of the plugin were unable to fix. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01jcgbtvf624d40fy604bjhyqf)) - f Matt decides to pull the plug, or something happens to him, that means 40% of the internet is suddenly without a way to get updates. And since updates are vital to open source projects, that basically means condemning 40% of the web. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01jcgbvaz8vhs8yy6smdmxc2s8)) - This has resulted in us at Wooping to seriously look at, and eventually support, good alternatives like [AspirePress](https://aspirepress.org) and [Andy Fragens’ Github Updater](https://github.com/afragen/git-updater), but more about those alternatives in a later blogpost. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01jcgbveq29nfecg8shav2n3z9))