Claude's New Cursor Killer Just Dropped  🔗 **Source:** [Claude's New Cursor Killer Just Dropped](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkHdkwDQJ5o) CLI are great, but they're not the bestway to do agentic coding. That's whyAnthropic finally put out an updatedversion of the Cloud Code desktop app,and it looks great. Wait, that's Codeex.Let me switch over to the Cloud appquick. Oh, that's T3 Code. Also looksvery similar. At least you can use theCloud models here, though, right? Noworry. We'll switch over to the Cloudapp now. Oh, wait. That's the new cursorglass app. Ah,okay. For real, though, this is the newClaude Code desktop app. It isn't adedicated app, unlike many of the others.They stuffed this in the traditionalClaude app as well as co-work. So, youhave the Claude chat, Claude Co-work,and Claude Code all in the same app. Andit is a huge improvement from the CLI. Ibet it probably even uses less RAM,though I haven't checked that yet. There's a lot to love here, and I amvery thankful Anthropic's finally wokenup to the fact that a slow, laggy CLIMight not be the best way to do realagent coding at scale, especially whenyou're working on multiple things atonce. Anthropic is really hyped aboutthis release. It seems like they've beenworking on it for a long time. I knowI've been seeing teasers about it for atleast a few months now. They have beenputting a ton of effort into baking thisnew desktop app. So much so, theyactually tweeted about it from theofficial Claude account, which almostnever happens. It seems like there's a lot of hype around this. So, I took sometime to really play with it myself. AndI have thoughts. I obviously have a lotto say about desktop vibe coding apps assomebody who has built one myself. And Iwill share all of my thoughts and moreright after a quick break for today'ssponsor. Do you know what Bun Clerk andNvidia all have in common? They all usetoday's sponsor, Code Rabbit. These guysget Code Review. Code Rabbit's an AIcode review platform used by pretty muchEverybody nowadays, like companies likeBun, Clerk, Life 360, Ashb, and ofcourse, Nvidia, even Jensen loves Code Rabbit. There's a reason why. From thesequence diagrams to the CLI and IDEintegrations to the quality of the codereview that you get, you just feel moreconfident when you ship once you set upCode Rabbit. If you haven't tried AIcode review yet, I don't care what typeof work you do. You really need to tryit. It's how a lot of my team startedusing AI in their workflow. So if yourcompany has an AI budget and you andyour team haven't spent it yet, youreally need to give something like thisa shot. It changes how code review works. To be very clear, those 2 millionrepos running Code Rabbit right now arenot projects that are removing the humanfrom the code review. That's not thepoint of AI code review. The point of AIcode review is to let the humans focuson the things that actually matter likewhat does the code do? What are theFlows? Is this achieving the goal? Code rabbit can help with those things, butwhere it really shines is catching allof the small mistakes that take up somuch of your brain. I cannot tell youhow liberating it was the first time we set up Code Rabbit to realize I don'thave to look for these small syntaxmistakes anymore, and I can focus on whatmatters, the big picture. Does the codedo what we need it to do? Ship fewer bugsand waste less engineering time atsoyv.link/code rabbit. So let's diveinto the cloud code desktop app. Thefirst thing I want to do before we gotoo deep is justify using these types ofguies. I have been amazed at how manypeople have talked [\_\_] on graphicaluser interfaces for their agent codingwithout actually trying them. It seemslike developers just feel like theterminal is the end-all fordevelopment. If you can use cloud codein the CLI, why would you ever go usethe GUI for it? There's a lot ofReasons. Here's a simple one. Screenshotpaste. And now I can see the screenshotthat I just pasted. I could ask and seeit here in the history and click theimage and probably even save it. Oh, youcan only copy it because their app sucks. But you can get an actual interface forthings that you're copying and pasting. Orlet's say I want to copy what it justresponded with. I can select the textand copy it. And if I paste this here,I'll turn on word wrap so it's a littleeasier to see. All the formatting iscorrect. This is the exact same threadin the cloud code. And if I try to copythis text from here instead, you'll seethe problem. It has a bunch of newlines. It doesn't need weird thingsinserted. It's not a good experience.This has bothered me for so long. Evenjust the word wrap breaking in weirdways like this because the space gotwrapped over. It's just bad. You can fixit. I'm not saying any of these thingsare end all be all. I'm just saying theyKind of suck, and they are very inconvenient. Or here, where I pasted theimage, and it attached the image to thetool call prior for some reason, and notto the message I sent. Although that oneis actually a bug in the desktop app,because, for some reason, when you pastean image, it sends it as a separatemessage before the message that yousend, because they don't even know how touse their SDK. And here is where theroasting begins, because this should begood, and it is better than the CLI, butit is better than the CLI simply becausethe CLI is such a trash piece ofsoftware that anything is better thanit. Not that all CLIs are bad, just thattheir CLI is particularly atrocious. So,what are some of the issues I'm seeing? That make me so upset? Well, the firstone is that the first time I ran this,it did this agent run when I was justasking it to go find performance issues,and it randomly stopped and then froze thethread. Could this have just been claBehind the scenes? Maybe, maybe not. Theicon is still here, which is terrible UX because this looks like it's still going,but it's not. For some reason, they justhave to stuff that logo there so youknow whose butthole it is that you'reusing. Let's ask the same question againquick. Also, no copy buttons anywhere,which is terrible. So, manually selectthat. Paste. Oh god, thoseupdates were bad. Yeah, this UI is kindof [ \_\_ ]. Allow cla to run. Yeah, Ipretty sure I already put it in bypassmode. I don't know why it forgot that. It already made a branch. I'm justasking it to find performance issues.Why is it making changes? Oh, because Iapproved something, so it's editing thepermissions. That's great. Oh, that'sreally funny. I resized the window soyou could see better and it resizedeverything in weird ways causing ah godif mythos is so good why is this app sobad? It missed a few things here thataren't true because it's opus which is aGood model, but it is not a super smartmodel, and often misses things. Well, atleast it responded properly and thenmade a branch and PR. It will give me abutton to merge that, which is [ \_\_ ]. Cringe as hell, apparently. File open file lets you open a file. Oh, you said itdoes nothing. It did something. It putit there. I don't know why that'suseful. But if I'm in a thread and I doit, will it still work? Okay, that'shilarious. The files are here, but it can'tsee the file. So, it's just an emptything. You can click the package.jsonname to copy that to clipboard. God,they just don't feel likethey're trying. It really doesn't. Andnot only does Codex do a much better jobat all of these types of things, Codexis also built on top of the Codex CLI'sapp server, which is fully open source. Again, Codex is on GitHub, the wholepackage, not the UI. So, the Codexdesktop app itself is not open source,sadly, but the Codex CLI, which powersIt is. And the Codex app server, whichis provided by the Codeex CLI, lets youbuild your own UI like this. That’s whyso many of these tools support codecsout of the box because you don’t evenneed to build a harness. You just pluginto theirs. And from my experience, youcan point most agents at this file, atthese docs, and they will buildsomething that works, which is reallycool. And if you’re worried about thelicensing, don’t be. It’s Apache, too. You’re very safe to use this. Not tojust glaze OpenAI, I’m still pissed atthem for keeping this closed source. I’mso pissed at them that it was a hugeinspiration for making T3 code. If theCodeex app was open source like the CLIis, I probably wouldn’t have made T3code. But it’s closed source, so I hadto make something else. Thankfully,these core pieces that I needed to buildit are open source and are wellsupported. Where with cloud code, Idon’t even know if I’m allowed. The gapHere is insane. It is absurd. It isfrustrating. I am tired. I am upset. I wish Anthropic would at least put effortin if they're not going to let me do itfor them. I think you reasonably havetwo options. Either you put out thethings I need to build what I want, oryou build something so good that I don'twant to. And Anthropic is failingabsurdly at both. But there are somethings that I found cool. Like if youright-click any other thread, you canclick open and split view. I think youalso, yeah, you can hold down command anddrag it to do a split view like that. And if you ignore the awful page layoutshift when that happens. Yeah, it'spretty cool. They also have a hotkey toopen up the terminal, which I believe iscommand, uh, sorry, control backtick. So I'mcurrently in the right tab here. I'm inthe right chat. So, obviously, when I hitthe hotkey of control tilda, it's goingto open up the terminal in that one. Oh,it opened it in the left one even thoughI was focused on the right one, and Ican't tab out because it uses the tab asan input in the terminal. So the windowyou're focused in does not determinewhich window the hotkeys work for, whichis, uh, great. Also, you can't hit that Xbutton because the grabber for theterminal is touching it. I'm not convinced that anybody who saidthey've been using this app for weeksactually used it. I hit like five bugslike this before I even made a changewith this app. I feel like I'm goingmad. I thought that anthropic modelswere supposed to be good at UI. Whathappened? There are some features thatare promising, like you can set up remotecontrol so other boxes on your networkcan be used to do things. So if I wantto, like, set up another Mac on mynetwork, I can connect to that and runsessions there from here. It'd be a lotcooler if you could do it from mobile,but their mobile implementation isreally focused on cloud code for web. Which is an entirely different product,by the way. Cloud code for web is theircloud option here, which uses cloud codein the web without the ability to reallyrun the code.Also, you have no insight here as towhat project your new thread is otherthan this little button where you pickwhich project. And it doesn't even havethe ones on the side here. So, I can'tlike go to T3 chat and make a new chatin T3 chat because it's not recentenough to be here. So, I have to gomanually find the folder to make a newT3 chat. What the [\_\_] every otherone of these apps has all of this stuff,right? If I hop into Codeex, I hover over Shu, I click new, and now I'm in anew chat for Shu. I can click this dropdown and pick any of the others in theorder they are in on the sidebar. Iswitched to round now in a differentproject. Like, are you kidding? Going todo a risky thing and install the nightlyfor T3 code that Julius just put up soThat I can show you guys how we'recooking some of these things. And now wehave the nightly built. And not only dowe have our projects, we actually go outof our way to grab the favicon if it'splaced in any reasonable location thatwe can find, so it's easier to see whichprojects are which, but we also have a new add project flow that I'm obsessedwith where you can just start typing andvery easily select whatever project youwant. Even better than the built-in MacOS file picker. It's so much better. Andyes, I know that the YouTube videocompression is not doing me any favorswith the grays. I will probably change thecolors a bit just for my compression ormaybe add some theming, but man, it'sso much nicer to add projects with a UIthat makes sense for it. Speaking of UIthat makes sense, this UI just makesmuch more sense. I don't want to justsit here and tell you guys about howmuch better T3 code is than everythingelse. But if you haven't tried it, do It. We'll do a more in-depth comparisonof all of the guies for Agentic Codingin the near future because there are alot of them. Like a lot of them. So, ifthat's interesting to you, let me knowin the comments and I'll do a breakdowncomparison showing all of the differentones and where their strengths andweaknesses are. Obviously, I have mypreferences, but that doesn't mean I'mnot trying everything else and seeing ifthere's good ideas to take. So, let mesteal, man. What are the good ideashere? Work trees built-in is cool. Worktrees built-in and checked by default. Less cool, but I get it. I think it's abig commitment for them to do that. Thatis kind of cool. You can add multiplefolders as context before starting athread so it knows that these arefolders it can and should access andcheck into. That's a nice idea. The ideaof being able to pull in context fromyour system without changing thedirectory you're operating in. That'sNice. Normally I just copy paste a path,but this is cool. The coolest thing inmy opinion, though, is what I was showingoff earlier with the tiling. The abilityto show multiple chats at once in a viewlike this is very cool. If onlycommand wing didn't put you in weirdstates. Like, I have this here. I'll putthis one to the side. And now, I’llcommand W the one on the right. And itdoes what you expect. It just closesthat. But if I command W the one on theleft, it puts us in the new chat view. Anthropic.You know what? I'm going to be a littleless harsh on them because I know howthis happens. AI is really good atbuilding the happy path. If you describeto an agent a user experience and aflow, even if it has to touch multipledifferent things, these models, theseharnesses, these tools have gotten goodenough to do the thing. But as soon asyou hit an edge case, like I'm sure thatat some point somebody gave the request. To the model of make sure command W willclose the thread that's currentlyfocused. And they did that as long asit's not the one on the left. If Icommand W the one on the right, it goesaway. But if I have two open, I commandW the one on the left, it does this viewbecause it's an edge case. And models donot find edge cases. Users find edgecases and then have to describe themwith the model in order to hopefully getthe model to behave. There is a messagein chat I want to go in on a bit here. The way the window splits is not goingto gain or lose the users. Bigs 360, youcouldn't be more correct with this. Andthis is the problem. And this is thereason that I am being as loud as I amabout anthropic. Too many of y'all justaccept the [\_\_] slop. The level ofslop that is being shipped by Anthropicis unfathomable and y'all just bear andgrin it. You just use it anyway.Despite the fact that there are dozensof better options that have moreFeatures, more functionality, morereliability, many of which are opensource, too. You just don't care. Andnow that Anthropic is directly competingwith what we have with T3 code, I willsay I am a bit scared because no one'sgoing to choose this interface. Of the current options that you have to pickfrom, the Cloud Code desktop app isclose to the bottom, if not the bottom.But it will still become the second orthird most popular option simply becauseyou sign into it the way you do thenormal Cloud app and it just works. it'stwo less clicks to sign in than otheroptions, but then 15 more clicks to doanything. And nobody is paying for theirCLA, so they have access to thisinterface. They are paying for their CLAbecause they like the models, they likethe inference, they like the answers itgives to their questions or thesolutions it generates for their codeproblems. And they're willing to pay asubscription in order to have more. Access. But instead of Anthropic justembracing the community and making iteasier for us to build things like this,they put themselves in such a shittystate that even they caused themselvesbugs. Again, I pasted a screenshot hereand it linked it to a message prior.Let's try this again. I'll do adifferent thread here. Going to paste. You know what? I'll do this twodifferent ways. Also, there's no easyway to delete that. I have to select itand then press the delete key. There'sno button for it. I can right-clickdelete. That's cool. But I'm going toswitch to the CLI to show you how thisis supposed to behave. Pasting the imagewith controlV, not commandV, because theterminal can't have images pasted intoit traditionally. And it puts it in linein the chat as image number one. I ask,what is this? And it puts image oneunderneath as an attachment with imageone in the copy. I can't believe theyactually shipped this like this. It’s soBad. But it's below where it belongs. Oh, it didn't update in the UI here. Ihave to manually refresh it to get theupdate in the UI. And now image one isin the text here. Ready for this?Pasting the same image here. Asking itto double check. It's no longer in thechat. I have to re-resume here for it toupdate. Waiting until it's done first. Oh, if you resume before it's done, itdoesn't even show you that. That'sgreat. Yep. So, the first time itattached as I showed before, and now Isaid double-check, and I put the imagebefore. Are you kidding? Like it's justso little taste. There are niceties inthe UI, like uh let me find the post, likesomeone pointed out that the hovertransitions and the menu hovers arebetter than average. Here's one thatpissed me off. You have to choose whereto store git work trees for isolatedcoding sessions, and the default isincludes.So you now have to go update your git. Ignore to ignore this or handle it properly when you use their workree implementation with the defaults, which is great. Like, as far as I know, cloud code is the only option where you have to modify your project to use it properly. You have to add things to your git ignore. You have to get it to stop dumping [ \_\_ ] in the cloud folder or something else just to use cloud code. Cursor has their cursor rule stuff, I know, but you don't have to do that to use it.You have to do this with Claude.And thankfully, Curser and many others are now embracing the standards like the agent MD and the agents directory skills and all of that. Anthropic still makes you put everything in quad files, quad MD, the quad directory, all of that.One more, and this is petty, but it pissed me off.Having a more button with one additional option, and then customize sidebar.Are you ready to see what customize sidebar has in it? I actually can't believe how pathetic this all is. How they take so much time and it stillfeels rushed out? Like how? Reminderthat the Codeex app is actually quitegood. Has no problems like this? Like itmight not be as pretty, but it reliablyworks. Things are where they should be.The new buttons behave how they should.You can drag and drop to reorder things. You can pin stuff in a way that makessense. They have their automation stuff,which is fine. These all work. Like itit just works. It is a little laggy attimes, but it works. I honestly thinkthe biggest change with the new ClaudeCode desktop app is that we finally havean official interface from Anthropicthat won't [ \_\_ ] your computer upperformance-wise. Actually, let's seehow right I am about that. I am scared,admittedly. Let's see what's wasting myCPU now. Now, the virtual machineservice for Claude is using 2 and a halfgigs of RAM. Yeah, the Claude desktopapp itself is using significantly lessmemory than before, which is a progress. It's using less than the CLI is, asfunny as that is. So, yeah, they fixedthe performance issues, but what's leftis everything else kind of sucking.Like, I like that. Um, what?I clicked settings here. Wait. Oh god,that's terrible UI. I'm not crazy thatthis settings button clearly looks likeit is associated with the T3.gg projecthere, right? Like, I folded that. Thesetwo are part of the same, right? Nope,it's not. This is for all things. Thisinline T3.gg settings button is not forT3.gg. This is for all projects. That was really funny.When I change the one at the top, thedrop-down disappears because again, themenu button is literally in that row. Soif I turn off image studio 2 or T3 chat,which are below, the dropdown stays open.But when I change the top one, the dropdown disappears because it's literallyrendered in line with that menu item.I'm trying to swear less in my videosand Anthropic is trying to make sure ICan't do that because, goddamn, I peoplein chat are saying they must not haveQA. Like actually, though, it's insane. I'm sorry, Theo. It physically hurts towatch the UX in that piece of hotsteaming [ \_\_] Lol. I'm gettingdistracted. Do they have no QA? And thenall of the laughs. Yeah, this feels likethey're testing the limits of how muchyou can ship a UI that was like [ \_\_ ] outwith a single prompt. This isunbelievable. It is so bad. Oh, at leastthey have forking now, where I can fork achat. That's cool. Does it show me hereif this is a work tree or not, though? How do I know what branch this is on? Idon't think I can. Okay, pantic herself.And yeah, it made a new work tree anddoesn't give me any insight into thatanywhere. Of course not. Why? Why would Ineed to know that I'm in a work tree?That’s definitely not important. One thingthey did here that's nice, is they madeit easier to turn off Opus 461 mil,which is from my experience a muchDumber version of Opus 4.6. Previously,you had to go edit config files yourselfto turn this off. I actually switched toOpus 4.5 in my local cloud code, whichhas helped even more. Oh, look. Eventhough I put on bypass permissionsalways, it still asks again. Great. Yeah, chat asked, "It's on accept editsagain. Does it really not save thepreference?" Yep. Oh, if you use voiceand have multiple chats. Oh, I got totest this. What else should I add tothis project? Are you kidding?Does stop stop the thread or does itstop the transcription? I know it'sgoing to stop the thread, so I'm notgoing to click it. Oh my god. You know,they vibe coded the multi-tab thingbecause, goddamn. And just forreference, here's a dev build of T3 Codewhere I added multi-tabwith scrollable. And if you open up aterminal in one, it opens up in the oneyou have selected. This was two prompts. Two prompts. No excuses. I'm done. I didactually come in here excited to trythis out, but I just feel that every feature feelsso beyond half-baked. Okay, here's thesidebar diff view. Clicking this doesn'tclose it after opening it. That opensmore things. That closes it. Oh, thatpopping's bad. Why are these not showingchanges? What happened there? Does itnot render if it's just additions? Like,why are half of those not rendering? That. Oh god. Can we take a moment toappreciate this icon and this icon?Sidebarification.That one's really funny. It leaves thatbutton in even when it doesn't haveenough space to open. So, right now, thesecond internal sidebar is open.We have to go far enough for it. And forsome reason, it didn't unfold all of thethings in this diff. Oh, it's not doingit again. See, these two are shown asopened, but they're not opened. I had toclose and open it to show me. I just. Theysay they've been using this for all ofTheir work. Either they're lying ortheir work isn't very serious because this is just like, are you kidding? Andlike T3 code has had its fair share ofembarrassing things. I'm not going topretend otherwise. We are two peoplebuilding in the open doing our best toget it working to the best of ourabilities. But god damn, this is justslop. I'll make the same request I didhere, but I have to manually select thistext because I don't have a click tocopy. You know, if it was open source, Iwould legitimately contribute fixes fora bunch of these things cuz it's notthat hard to fix most of these things. Reminder, we have a one-click copy. Wehave resizing that doesn't break thewhole app. And once it makes thesechanges, I'll show you that we also havea diff view that actually works. Sorry. Wait, do they not have an open in youreditor of choice button? Oh, there's anupdate. I can relaunch to apply. Want tosee how many of those bugs have beenFixed? I wonder if they just set a cloudcode instance to listen to me as I [ \_\_ ] and then prompt it. Okay, so it'supdating, but I don't see any proof. Oh,there it is all the way in the back. Cool. Does voice still input in bothtext boxes? Yes, it does. Wonderful. Howabout the terminal? It opened in the rightone. Say, I bish this on Twitter. Nope.None of the bugs are fixed. Guys, there are two reasons as a lab tobuild an app like this. Reason one isthat you want to lock users in becauseyour goal is to try and get users to bepart of your ecosystem so they willcontinue using your stuff, so that if anew model comes out for somebody else,they'll just stay in your app and noteven use it. That's reason one is thelock inside. That's why they're being soshitty about the terms of service,because they don't want people to moveto another app where it's easy to switchoff of their stuff if their models don'tkeep up. That's reason one. Reason twoIs because you're trying to showcase how powerful your models and thetechnologies are. That's why everybodyon the cloud code team constantly bragsabout how they use cloud code for all ofthe changes they make. This is a [\_\_]showcase. And I hope I pray that peoplewho actually code seriously are asinsulted with the lack of basic QAetiquette that exists here enough to useanything else. Anything else. Again, twopeople working on T3 Code, the open-source app, were able to make somethingin 1/5 of the time that is significantlybetter, more polished, more reliable,functional. This feels like a joke. Like, anti-gravity was bad. Anti-gravitywas so bad that it caused Ben to crashout in my video. This is comparably bad,but it's not Google, so there's noexcuse. Oh, and look, our changes overhere finished. So let's view the diffwhich actually works and renderseverything properly. I know so difficultto do that. You can even see differentTurns, and what changed within thembecause we snapshot all of it. You havethe separate horizontal before afterview. You can turn word rap on and offand it just works. Yeah. Diffs.com. Hugeshout out to them for making a greatopen-source solution for rendering diffsin the browser. Also of note is how wellwe handle long threads. I'm in a nightly and I just wipe my DB so I don't haveany. But Julia showed me a thread thatliterally took 10 minutes to scroll tothe top because he has been using thesame thread for weeks now for one of thethings he was working on. And thecombination of the codeex compressionand compaction being good and our renderPF being good meant that he could havedozens of turns and millions of tokensin one thread, and scroll the whole thingwith no issues. I couldn't fathom howlong that thread was. All the hotkeysare bound wrong. Cool. So, I'm in theright view here in the new Cloud Codedesktop app. There's a hotkey to change. Permissions. So, if you want to switchfrom bypass to the DEF O, even though Iwas focused on the right, the hotkeygoes left. Seems like all of the hotkeysgo to the first window except forcommand W, whichever window you're inwill close unless it's the first window,and then it puts you in the new chatview. How did they do the binding fortheir hotkey layer? Julius and I spentso much time trying to figure out theright way to do hotkeys. And Juliusspent even more time roasting me when Idid them wrong with one of myimplementations. Little things like, "Ohgod, command 1, 2, and 3 swap between chat, co-work, and code." Idon't know about you guys, how often areyou switching between chat, co-work, andcode when you're working on a codething? Why would they hotkey that tosome of the most useful hotkeysavailable? Because we have commandnumbers as switching between yourthreads. And notice how when I pressLike I'm pressing eight right now thatthey switch instantly because wepre-render and cache properly. Soeverything [ \_\_ ] works. I'm going toclick a thread now. Takes like over asecond to load with like nothing in it. Insane. They have routines. Createtemplated routines that can be kickedoff on a schedule by API or web hook. Cool. I can set up a cron that runscloud code on my machine as long as theapp's open. Great. Exactly what Ineeded. You can customize with skillsand connectors. They have a wholeplug-in store. They hid the iMessage one. No, no, theydidn't. It's in connectors. Terms ofservice violation built in. Super cool. So, they can violate Apple's TOS, but Ican't violate theirs for just usingtheir stuff. That's great. That feels soshoehorned in. I thought they had like abrowser thing. Oh, preview. Run your devserver to inspect network requests,debug with logs, and see changes live. That actually sounds promising. Oh,again it has to modify the cloud launchfile because you can't use anthropicstuff unless you want to dedicate yourproject to using anthropic stuff. It hasbypass permissions on and I still haveto give it permission. Oh, I got it toask questions. Will this work? Can Ipress one and have it do the rightthing? It doesn't even submit when youpress it. And I can't double press enterwill. Okay, enter will submit it. Allowcla to use preview start. I havebypassed permissions on. If this was avibecoded thing that two small devs at arecent YC company were showing me, Iwould probably pass on the investmentbecause it is so questionable. But froma multi-billion dollar near trilliondollar company that has supposedly beenworking on this for months that havebeen saying constantly that if you likeConductor, just wait. The new Cloud Codedesktop app's going to blow you away.Chat keeps dropping bangers for fun. Intuitive behaviors like drag and drop.Let's reorder some of these things. I'llmove T3 Chat to the top. Oh, I can'tmove T3 chat. I can't change whichproject is where. That's fine. I'll justmove this thread up to maybe below.Nope. You can only drag the thread soyou can put them in pinned or splitviews. Their little browser is super[ \_\_ ] laggy. And when you turn offtheir toolbar thing here, it breaks thepage layout because now it thinks it'swider than it actually is. That's supercool. You can select an element and sayagain, oh, I selected the same elementtwice. That's great. Make this copy better. That's a great screenshot thatit auto includes, barely making the textreadable. That copy is worse. You'reright. Let me revert it. What would youlike it to say? You didn't [ \_\_ ]revert it, though. I'm done. I can't doit. I tried. I the idea of the browserand the model having access to browserand web logs and requests and [ \_\_ ] toFix things seems really cool. I've yetto see it work well enough. This is notit. I can't. They I normally wouldsay, well, they tried, but I don'treally believe they did. I got nothing. If they're not going to put effort intomaking the app, I'm not going to puteffort into the outro. Goodbye.And make sure you check out T3 Code.It's free, open source, and doesn't suckanywhere near this., Claude's New Cursor Killer Just Dropped, YouTube, 01krc5y8x43z4dr586jzhcatqm.