Mike Winger Goes NUCLEAR After These Threats ![rw-book-cover](https://img.youtube.com/vi/6h38go-y_FY/maxresdefault.jpg) 🔗 **Source:** [Mike Winger Goes NUCLEAR After These Threats](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY) > [!note]+ Document Notes > --- > tags: [online-harassment, religious-polemics, christian-apologetics, media-literacy, anti-muslim-rhetoric] > author: Ruslan KD > source: Ruslan KD > reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY > date created: {{date:YYYY-MM-DD}} {{time:HH:mm}} > --- > # 🏷️ Title: Mike Winger Goes NUCLEAR After These Threats > ## 🧭 Table of Contents > - [📝 Summary](#-summary) > - [📖 Main Content](#-main-content) > - [🗒️ Notes](#️-notes) > - [📚 References](#-references) > - [🗣️ Paraphrase](#️-paraphrase) > - [📰 Newsletter](#-newsletter) > - [✅ Action Items](#-action-items) > - [🧪 Hypotheses](#-hypotheses) > - [📊 Methodology](#-methodology) > - [❓ Questions](#-questions) > - [🔮 Future Research](#-future-research) > - [💡 Implications](#-implications) > - [🧠 Learning Styles Assessment](#-learning-styles-assessment) > - [📊 Accessibility Assessment](#-accessibility-assessment) > - [🌍 DEIB Assessment](#-deib-assessment) > - [✅ Logical Validity](#-logical-validity) > - [🛡️ DARVO Analysis](#-darvo-analysis) > - [🎯 Conclusion](#-conclusion) > - [🔄 Refactor Appendix](#-refactor-appendix--mike-winger-goes-nuclear-after-these-threats) > - [🧰 Template Library](#-template-library) > ### 🔗 References > - [Video source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY) > - The video quotes social posts and a crowdfunding appeal but does not supply a complete evidence packet in the transcript. > ## 📝 Summary > - Ruslan reports that a Christian apologist and his family faced doxxing, stalking, and threats after publishing criticism of Islam. > - The video then shifts from a safety appeal into a long celebration of polemical posts about Islamic history, scripture, marriage, slavery, health, intelligence, and political influence. > - The safety claim matters and should be assessed through incident evidence, platform reports, and law-enforcement or security documentation where disclosure is safe. > - The video weakens its case by moving from alleged acts by named people to broad statements about Muslims, Muslim-majority countries, intelligence, and violence. > - Readers should separate three questions: Was a family credibly threatened? Are the religious claims accurate? Does any evidence justify group-wide conclusions? The video often treats them as one argument. > ## 📖 Main Content > - **Safety event:** The opening quotes a call for donations to relocate a family after alleged stalking, doxxing, and threats. > - **Strategic response:** Another apologist says the threats led him to spend more time criticizing Islam. > - **Polemical list:** The video repeats claims about Muhammad, Aisha, adoption, revelation, the Trinity, scripture, slavery, polygamy, health practices, cousin marriage, and university influence. > - **Commercial interruption:** A prayer journal is promoted midway through the threats-and-polemics discussion. > - **IQ argument:** Country-level figures are attributed to cousin marriage and religion without controls for education, conflict, poverty, health, measurement quality, or sampling. > - **Personal history:** Ruslan relates his Armenian family’s displacement from Azerbaijan and uses that trauma to explain why the topic feels personal. > - **Boundary problem:** He later says the claims do not describe every Muslim, but earlier language repeatedly generalizes Muslims as hostile, aggressive, and prone to terrorism. > - **Online conflict:** An opposing account calls him a grifter; he replies with ridicule, grammar insults, and the same disputed IQ frame. > ## 🗒️ Notes > #### ⏱️ [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY&t=0) A safety appeal starts the story > - The opening claim is specific enough to investigate: doxxing, real-world stalking, credible threats, relocation, and a fundraiser. > - Safety-sensitive details should not be republished if doing so increases risk. > #### ⏱️ [00:44](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY&t=44) Threats become a reason for more polemics > - The stated response is to increase public criticism of Islam. > - That may be a legitimate speech choice, but it does not substitute for incident response, evidence preservation, and protection planning. > #### ⏱️ [05:03](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY&t=303) Commerce enters a high-emotion segment > - A product promotion appears between claims about sexual abuse, violence, and religious conflict. > - The placement does not disprove the safety claims, but it creates an incentive and tone question that viewers should notice. > #### ⏱️ [06:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY&t=416) Country IQ claims collapse several variables > - The speaker moves from cousin marriage to national IQ averages and then to religious-majority comparisons. > - This is an ecological inference without controls, source-quality discussion, or uncertainty. > #### ⏱️ [10:01](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY&t=601) Insults replace evidence > - An opponent calls Ruslan a grifter; Ruslan answers with grammar and IQ ridicule. > - Neither insult tests the original threat, religious, or fundraising claims. > #### ⏱️ [11:23](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY&t=683) Personal trauma explains urgency but not group guilt > - The family history of ethnic cleansing is relevant context for fear and vigilance. > - It cannot establish that members of a global religious group “always” become violent. > ## 📚 References > - [Video source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h38go-y_FY) > - Independent verification of the threat record, fundraiser claims, quoted posts, country-IQ data, and historical assertions remains outside the captured source. > ## 🗣️ Paraphrase > - Ruslan begins with a report that a Christian creator’s family needs to move after threats and doxxing. > - He treats another creator’s decision to criticize Islam more often as a major escalation in online apologetics. > - He reads a fast sequence of historical and theological claims, often with laughter or ridicule rather than source comparison. > - A product promotion interrupts the sequence, after which the video returns to marriage, medical, intelligence, and political claims. > - Ruslan becomes a target of online insults and answers with more insults. > - He closes by connecting the conflict to his Armenian refugee history, briefly limiting his claims to Islam rather than every Muslim, and inviting further audience engagement. > ## 📰 Newsletter > This video begins with a serious digital-safety problem and then becomes a lesson in why safety reporting and religious polemics need separate lanes. Credible threats call for documentation, protection, platform escalation, and careful fundraising disclosure. Claims about a global faith call for sources, narrow language, and no guilt by association. When those lanes merge, a real victim can be defended with arguments that place unrelated people under suspicion. > ## ✅ Action Items > #### DevRel > - Build a harassment-response guide covering evidence preservation, platform escalation, private safety coordination, and public communication. > #### OSPO > - Maintain threat-reporting, moderator safety, privacy, incident-retention, and funding-disclosure policies for public contributors. > #### Community > - Protect threatened people while enforcing rules against group-wide hostility, doxxing, slurs, and retaliatory harassment. > #### WordPress > - **Core:** No direct code action; protect contributor privacy in public metadata and moderation flows. > - **Core Performance:** Not applicable to this source. > - **Core AI:** Test moderation systems against dehumanizing generalizations and context collapse. > - **Core Program Team:** Coordinate safety, legal, moderation, communications, and support roles before incidents. > - **Mobile:** Make block, report, evidence-export, and emergency-contact actions easy to reach. > - **Playground:** Use synthetic examples for moderation testing; never expose real threat details. > - **Community:** Train organizers on threat intake and protected escalation. > - **Training:** Teach source verification, ecological fallacy, and responsible religious literacy. > - **Marketing:** Do not turn a live safety incident into engagement bait. > - **Support:** Offer a confidential escalation route with response expectations. > - **Design:** Separate report submission, evidence storage, and public discussion. > - **Documentation:** Publish safety policy, privacy limits, and fundraiser disclosure standards. > - **Photos:** Remove identifying location data when personal safety is at risk. > - **TV:** Apply content warnings, captions, and moderation to high-conflict uploads. > - **Polyglots:** Translate safety guidance without turning group labels into accusations. > - **Accessibility:** Ensure report tools work with screen readers, keyboards, cognitive supports, and low-bandwidth devices. > - **Meta:** Limit public exposure of personal identifiers and preserve abuse-report audit trails. > - **CLI:** Offer safe export of moderation evidence with access controls and redaction. > - **Hosting:** Support emergency takedown, log preservation, and account-security review. > - **Tide:** Review plugins that expose personal data or weaken moderation boundaries. > - **Openverse:** Remove doxxing material and honor safety-related deletion requests. > - **Themes:** Avoid displaying author metadata that creates needless location risk. > - **Plugins:** Build abuse-reporting tools with least-privilege access and retention controls. > #### The WPCC > - Fund contributor-safety training and confidential incident support with clear eligibility and privacy rules. > ### FAIR > - Keep safety records portable and inspectable while applying strict access controls and redaction. > ## 🧪 Hypotheses > - Public incident statements that separate verified facts from broader commentary produce less retaliatory harassment. > - Product promotions inside crisis content reduce audience trust even when the underlying crisis is real. > - Group-wide language increases hostile comments without improving factual understanding. > - A structured threat-response playbook shortens time to relocation, account hardening, and evidence preservation. > - Viewers shown confounders reject unsupported country-IQ causation more often. > ### 📊 Methodology > - Code a sample of safety-incident videos for verified facts, group generalizations, commercial appeals, and hostile-comment rates. > - Compare audience trust across identical incident summaries with and without product promotion. > - Audit the IQ claims against original datasets, sampling methods, measurement debates, and multivariable models. > - Interview safety professionals about which public details help or harm protection. > - Run moderation tests using synthetic content, never live victim data. > ### ❓ Questions > - What evidence establishes the threat as credible without exposing the family? > - Who controls and audits the fundraiser? > - Which historical and scriptural claims have primary citations? > - What source produced the country-IQ chart, and what confounders were modeled? > - How can Christian–Muslim debate reject threats without treating whole communities as suspects? > ### 🔮 Future Research > - Study how online religious polemics affect offline threat levels. > - Compare platform response times for doxxing across creator size and identity. > - Test whether content warnings and source panels reduce hostile engagement. > - Develop trauma-informed guidance for speakers whose family histories shape current conflict. > ### 💡 Implications > - **Practice:** Separate victim protection, religious criticism, and audience growth. > - **Policy:** Threat response and anti-hate moderation must operate at the same time. > - **Security:** Minimize personal data, preserve evidence, harden accounts, and coordinate relocation privately. > - **Education:** Teach the difference between criticizing ideas and assigning guilt to people. > - **Funding:** Safety aid needs transparent control without publishing dangerous details. > ### 🧠 Learning Styles Assessment > - Reading level estimate: roughly grade 9–11, with conversational phrasing but dense religious, historical, and statistical claims. > #### 👀 Visual learners > - Present: quoted posts and charts; improve with sourced claim cards and uncertainty labels. > #### 🔊 Aural learners > - Present: narrated commentary; improve with a calm factual summary separated from reactions. > #### 🗣️ Verbal learners > - Present: repeated explanations; improve by defining doxxing, dawa, ecological fallacy, and Islamism. > #### 🧩 Kinesthetic learners > - Present: no safe practice activity; improve with a synthetic threat-response tabletop exercise. > #### 🧠 Logical learners > - Present: a loose sequence of claims; improve with a claim-evidence table and causal diagram. > #### 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Social learners > - Present: invites comments; improve with moderated interfaith source review. > #### 🧘‍♀️ Solitary learners > - Present: transcript allows private review; improve with a verification checklist. > #### 🌿 Naturalistic learners > - Present: not applicable; a systems map of online escalation could help. > ### 📊 Accessibility Assessment > #### Screen reader semantics > - The transcript is available but needs headings, content warnings, and corrected names. > #### Keyboard navigation > - Video and fundraiser paths should be fully keyboard operable. > #### Contrast and readability > - Screenshots, charts, and quoted posts need readable contrast and enlargement. > #### Text resizing and reflow > - Evidence panels must reflow at 200% zoom. > #### Media and captions > - Captions need correction; sensitive segments need a content warning and chapter boundaries. > #### Forms and interactions > - Donation and report forms need clear ownership, privacy notices, errors, and target sizes. > #### Standards reference > - Check WCAG 2.2 AA criteria 1.2.2, 1.3.1, 1.4.3, 1.4.10, 2.1.1, 2.4.6, 2.5.8, and 3.3.2. > ### 🌍 DEIB Assessment > #### Cultural breadth > - Muslim voices and independent scholars are absent; the video treats a vast global community through adversarial examples. > #### Inclusive language > - Broad claims that Muslims are hostile, unintelligent, or prone to terrorism are harmful and unsupported at group scale. > #### Neurodiversity support > - Rapid topic changes, ridicule, and high emotional intensity increase cognitive load. > #### Representation > - Christian apologists dominate; threatened families, ordinary Muslims, safety professionals, and researchers are not represented directly. > #### Psychological safety > - Add warnings for doxxing, child sexual abuse, religious hostility, ethnic cleansing, and threats; moderate comments aggressively. > ### ✅ Logical Validity > #### Strong reasoning > - The opening identifies concrete threat categories that can be documented. > - The speaker eventually distinguishes every Muslim from ideological claims, though the limitation comes after repeated generalizations. > - Personal history gives relevant context for emotional stakes when treated as context rather than proof. > #### Fallacies > - **Hasty generalization:** Acts attributed to named people become claims that Muslims “always” resort to violence. Fix: name the actors and avoid universal language. > - **Ecological fallacy:** Country IQ averages are attributed to religion and cousin marriage without individual-level evidence or controls. Fix: use credible multivariable research and state uncertainty. > - **Ad hominem:** Grammar, “clown,” “grifter,” and IQ insults do not test the claims. Fix: answer evidence with evidence. > - **Appeal to ridicule:** Laughter and disgust cues replace source analysis in several historical claims. Fix: cite primary texts and scholarly interpretations. > - **False dichotomy:** “Leave Islam and turn to Christ” frames a complex truth inquiry as two immediate options. Fix: separate critique from conversion appeal. > - **Guilt by association:** Violent actors, governments, ordinary Muslims, and disputed doctrines are repeatedly collapsed. Fix: distinguish people, institutions, texts, and movements. > #### Tone of voice > - Urgent, combative, mocking, personal, promotional, and triumphalist. > ### 🛡️ DARVO Analysis > - **Deny:** “I’m just reporting” minimizes the speaker’s active selection, endorsement, and commentary. > - **Attack:** Both sides use “grifter,” “clown,” intelligence insults, and credibility attacks. > - **Reverse victim/offender:** An opponent reportedly reframes the threatened Christian as exploiting danger for money; the available excerpt is too incomplete to judge the claim. > - A real threat and manipulative rhetoric can coexist. Naming one does not erase the other. > ## 🎯 Conclusion > The reported doxxing and threats deserve a careful, private, evidence-led safety response. They do not justify treating Muslims as a single hostile class. The video is most useful as a media-literacy case: urgent protection, religious criticism, statistical claims, commerce, trauma, and online feuds must be separated before any conclusion is trusted. > ## 🔄 Refactor Appendix — Mike Winger Goes NUCLEAR After These Threats > ### 📚 Literature Atoms > ### [H1] Threat reporting requires a separate evidence lane > > [!quote] ID:rw_01ky7v1vzdk6r0wan4zfqzhpkw_h1 > > “due to credible threats, real-world stalking, and doxxing.” > **Context & use**: > - 00:31–00:41; the opening fundraiser appeal. > - Use to route safety evidence away from public polemics. > **Tags**: #xref > **Highlight**: Inline highlight intentionally omitted under the sensitive-content rule. > <!-- atomicity: 1 idea ✓ --> > ### [H2] Personal trauma does not establish group guilt > > [!quote] ID:rw_01ky7v1vzdk6r0wan4zfqzhpkw_h2 > > “this is very personal to me in a sense.” > **Context & use**: > - 11:23–12:32; family displacement and ethnic cleansing. > - Use when distinguishing explanatory context from evidence about a whole group. > **Tags**: #xref #articleseed > **Highlight**: Inline highlight intentionally omitted under the sensitive-content rule. > <!-- atomicity: 1 idea ✓ --> > ### [H3] Crisis commerce creates an incentive question > > [!quote] ID:rw_01ky7v1vzdk6r0wan4zfqzhpkw_h3 > > “we have sold over 15,000 of these.” > **Context & use**: > - 05:03–05:55; prayer-journal promotion inside the crisis discussion. > - Use as a disclosure and audience-trust question, not proof that the threat is false. > **Tags**: #xref > **Highlight**: Inline highlight intentionally omitted under the sensitive-content rule. > <!-- atomicity: 1 idea ✓ --> > ### 🧠 Permanent Candidates > #### [P1] A real threat does not validate every surrounding claim > **Claim**: Evidence of danger establishes a safety duty without proving the speaker’s broader claims about a religion or population. > **Evidence pointer**: [[#H1]] > **Scope & conditions**: Holds when incident evidence and ideological claims concern different units of analysis. > **Links**: > - [[Threat Modeling]] — because applies-in personal safety. > - [[Guilt by Association]] — because contrasts with group-wide inference. > - [[Evidence Boundaries]] — because extends claim-scoped verification. > <!-- atomicity: 1 idea ✓ --> > ### ✏️ Fleeting Queue > - [F1] Find a safe, independent account of the threat response without exposing location data. #xref > - [F2] Trace the country-IQ chart to its original dataset and methodology. #articleseed > ### → Things 3 > - [ ] Draft a claim-evidence separation checklist for high-conflict videos — media literacy #things > ## 🧰 Template Library > ### Fleeting template > - Capture one verification question without repeating harmful personal data. > ### Literature template > - Record one bounded claim, exact quote, context, and safety note. > ### Permanent template > - State one reusable evidence rule with scope and annotated links. Recently after Michael Jones was doxxed for his work regarding apologetics towards Islam, Mike Winger came out in support and posted this going completely nuclear on the entire situation. Okay, so check this out. Mike Winger said, "Muslims are stalking and threatening Christians online who are seen as too successful at converting other Muslims to Christianity. My friend Michael Jones is one of those Christians. His family's in serious danger from these Muslims and he needs to move to a different safer house due to credible threats, real-world stalking, and doxxing. If you have benefited from Inspiring Philosophy's YouTube content or just want to help a brother out keep his family safe, please consider donating." So, he posted the GoFundMe as many of us did. He goes on to say, "Due to recent increases in Muslim threats against Christians online, I have made a decision. I'm going to help expose Islam more." Now, this is significant because as you can see, Mike Winger hasn't spent a lot of time talking about Islam on his YouTube channel. His YouTube channel's over a million subscribers now. He spent a lot of time doing the exposure stuff within hyper-charismatic churches recently, but he's primarily known for Bible teaching. He's primarily known for his 10 Questions with Mike Winger live streams on Fridays. I actually discovered him watching a video "The Bible Changed My Mind About Alcohol." It's like everything the Bible says about alcohol, long video. It's like 2018-2019. So, him saying, "Okay, now I'm going to intentionally carve out time to dig into the craziness of Islam" is not a good look for the Dawah Bros. And again, we're going to come back to the Dawah Bros who are starting to crash out even more here in a second. But let's get back to his tweets. He goes on to say, "Muhammad had sex with a 9-year-old." Okay, as you guys know, that is Aisha. Their excuse for this is, "But you don't understand. Aisha was post-pubescent." Even though their own sources say that Aisha played with dolls. >> Darkness. >> Muhammad saw his adopted son's wife and lusted after her, so he made them get divorced so he could add her to his harem of women. And after people complained that he can't marry his son's ex-wife, he outlawed adoption as a rule in Islam to justify this. He said God said so. I didn't know that. That's really interesting. You know, when you hear about stuff like this in the scriptures in 1 Corinthians 5, it's discovered that there is a man who is uh is a sleeping with his father's wife. That person is excommunicated. He's kicked out of the church. Says to hand him over to Satan. But in Islam, Muhammad's doing this sort of stuff and uh he just kind of changes the rules uh to to make it make sense for him. Let's keep going. He says Muhammad didn't like people asking him questions after dinner, so he got a revelation that God told him to tell everyone they can't ask him questions after dinner. >> [laughter] >> It's in the Quran now. This is great. Muhammad seems to have been confused about what Christians believed that he thought the Trinity was Father, Son, and Mary. This is great. Google the Islamic dilemma, which of course we've been talking about it. David Wood kind of coined the idea. And the dilemma, simply put, is that when you look at the Quran, the Quran seems to affirm the previous sources that came before it, particularly uh the God the Gospel, the New Testament, and the Old Testament. And so, it's told to go measure whatever the Quran says it with the Old Testament scriptures and the New Testament, which then means that Islam is false because those scriptures contradict Islam. So, that's the Islamic dilemma in a nutshell. Uh the Quran says that the sun sets in a pool of mud on Earth somewhere. It says that Alexander the Great traveled west until he found that spot. It also says that people live there at the pool of mud where the sun sets and which Alexander the Great visited once. Fact-check me. Leave Islam and turn to Christ. Go from darkness to light. Let your zeal for God be true for the true God and his son who died for our sins and rose again. He goes on to point out the uh rather obvious egregious teachings on ex-slavery. Uh it's been standard Islamic practice for the majority of Islamic history. It didn't just happen alongside Islam as a cultural reality. It happened directly due to the teachings of Islam, its doctrine. Okay, so that's pretty dark. The Quran limits Muslim men to only four wives. We know that, but Muhammad had special permission from God to have as many wives as he wanted. It's because God told him to write that down. That's why. Don't blame Muhammad. He's just following orders. Andrew Tate thought Islam was attractive because they were willing to kill people for stuff like making a cartoon about Muhammad. That's a terrible reason. So this is one of the craziest situations I've heard of and the way this entire thing played out has been absolutely poetic. But you know what's also crazy? It's how many of you guys still don't have the Blessed God Prayer Journal to help add some structure to your devotional time. One of the best things about this prayer journal is it allows you to jot down and start with your prayer request, then go down praying for other people and personal prayers for yourself, memory verse, I will get this done. We have sold over 15,000 of these. It's amazing, affordably priced. You can go to blessedgod.co, pick this up now. I think often times we need to be reminded more than we need to be taught and when you create a system for journaling your prayers just like this, it is an amazing way for you to remember that all the times that God answers our prayers and we forget. So this is available at blessedgod.co. You can pick it up right now. Start utilizing it and I promise you you will be rocked by how often your prayers are answered. You just forget because you're not journaling and jotting them down. All right? So, blessgod.com, link in the pinned comment in the description. He again puts up this post. He says, "How old was the youngest female Muhammad married? 16, 12, 9, or 6?" Well, people guessed accurately, 6. Aisha was 6 years old. They consummated it not the marriage at 9, and they say that she still played with dolls, which is forbidden for post-pubescent uh women to do. Okay. Uh what are we looking at here? Muhammad taught his followers to drink camel urine to cure medical conditions. Many Muslims still do it today. I did not know this. It's supposed to cure diseases, but it's not only debasing and disgusting, it can give you some very serious health problems. But Muhammad said so, so you can buy some today. Ugh. Yuck. Yeah, all these tweets are in the same day and he just I mean he just keeps going and going. This is not a good look to get Mike Winger against you. Let's keep going. Let's keep going. He says "Islam's practice of marrying first cousins regularly has actually lowered the IQ of whole nations to a significant degree. Muslim nations have much lower IQ than Christian majority nations, like 20 points lower. 20 points, that's huge, okay? So, 80 IQ is substantially lower than 100 IQ. This is significant because the average IQ in America is 98. If it's 20 points lower on average, that means that you're talking about a sub 80 IQ. Okay, now I'm not I'm not going to say the term cuz it's outdated, but it's on the screen for you guys if you're watching. It's diagnosed when an individual has an IQ of roughly 70 or below. So, think about that for a second. If you have an IQ below 70, that means that you are intellectually disabled. Okay? Now, there's quite a few countries that are really close on that spectrum. If you didn't know below 70, you're intellectually disabled. And places like Qatar, the average IQ the average IQ in Qatar is 78. Okay? Predominantly Muslim country. Versus countries that don't have a huge Muslim influence, you'll see that the IQ is substantially larger. For example, we have this chart here which says that uh man, places like Yemen, Syria, Egypt, Algeria all have IQs below 80. Why? Well, because they allow for cousin marriage. And cousin marriage done over and over again uh tends to lead to substantially lower IQs. And that's crazy when the 70 number is when you're intellectually disabled. Man, he even involves Israel in this situation. He says, "Who spends more money trying to control the thought of students in the United States? Jewish nations or Muslim nations?" It's not even remotely close. Muslim nations spend far more trying to control the thought of students as is evident by the current trends and discourses. This is very true of Qatar. He says, "In the Quran, Muhammad really makes it look like he never actually read the Torah or the New Testament. He confuses Maryam, the sister of Moses, with Mary, the mother of Jesus. Yikes." And this is as recent as an hour ago. He says, "This is part of a serious problem. Islam taking over the next step is far more violent." And he plays uh it looks like they're praying in Qatar. Muslims don't take over and block streets to pray in Qatar, Dubai, or even Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam. It's illegal and considered disruptive. Yeah, I mean, a lot of these places, particularly like Dubai, United Arab Emirates, uh they crack down very hard on the jihadis and the radicals. Um and they don't allow this sort of foolishness. So, the that we're allowing this stuff in America, I think just shows how idiotic we are on this. He then points out to the people who are okay with this marriage of 9-year-olds, which still happens in Islam today. Folks who are upset about Epstein files, but yet okay with this happening in Islam. Now, I also told you guys that now I'm getting roped into it. I don't know why. I'm just reporting on what's happening. I'm just telling you guys and giving you guys up to date on what's happening. Well, apparently Dr. Malik, who's not a real doctor, said, "Guys, can I introduce you to another grifter? His name is Ruslan" in in quotations. No, that's that's really my name. He says, "He's a grifter and a half. The Orthodox exposed this clown already. And a half and a half the Orthodox explain this." There's that 20-point lower IQ kicking in right there. I don't I don't even know what that means. Another guy who grifts off Christianity but can't debate his religion. Clown. And he posted a old article of me from 2019 same storyline. Let me cry and blaspheme and my life is under threat. Then I'll cash out. Grift Christians because they the easiest people to Wow. This is so bad. You guys should go read this article, by the way. Circumcision saved my life of Christian under threat from terrorists. Yeah, this is my my testimony. So, I don't know I wonder if this Malik is going to put it on Piru, blood. Let me know what you guys think in the comments section. You going to put it on Piru? Is it I'm I'm a grifter and bad grammar, bad English. IQ showing through. But is he going to put it on Piru? That's that's what I want to know. Now, in a moment we got to react to Apostate Prophet highlighting all this for David Wood. But before we get there, let me just say some of you guys know this about my story. We came to the United States as refugees because we're ethnically Armenians who were living in Azerbaijan, which is just north of Iran, and they exiled, ethnically cleansed, an actual ethnic cleansing of all the Armenians from Baku in the late '80s, and then they did it again uh in the autonomous region, Nagorno-Karabakh region, uh in 2023. 100,000 Armenians were recently exiled in 2023, and half a million were exiled in uh the late '80s because of the pogroms of Baku. You guys can go Google this and look up the footage. It was barbaric. It was violent. Uh people lost their lives. And so, I've always known that Muslims are hostile. They're aggressive. This is before terrorism. This is before 9/11. This is before any of this stuff was really even talked about in America. I've grown up understanding that this part of the world, particularly because it's ran and influenced by Muslims, has always been more aggressive, and they always resort to violence, and they always become terrorist when things don't go their way, or they find a scapegoat, which is exactly what happened as me and my family came to the United States. So, this is very personal to me in a sense. Uh but, God used it all for his glory. Romans 8:28, which says, "For all things work for good for those who love God and are called according to his purpose." From my vantage point, I don't think this is indicative of all Muslims, but I do think it's indicative of Islam and what the Islamists teach and what then becomes a downstream effect of the dawa bros and the jihadis, and then women having to step in and fill in, and then them melting down because Christians want to support their own, and then they start boxing and putting it on Piru. It's all hilarious to me. And what's also hilarious is AP bringing all this Mike Winger stuff to David Wood's attention in uh their latest livestream. >> Anyway, I find it very, very nice that uh Mike Winger is going after Islam. First of, there is no such person who attacks Islam as effectively as Mike Winger would do it. Especially not some some tall, white guy with glasses. I mean, think of it. When you when you when you ask somebody, "Hey, is there a Christian apologist who effectively critiques Islam, who critiques many of Islam's aspects?" People generally cannot think of anyone, right? Mike Winger is just filling that gap. He needs to come in. He needs to be the first Christian apologist who actually effectively criticizes Islam. So, I hope he does that. Anything else you want to say about this statement? >> My question to you guys is, what do you think this does to the ongoing feud between David Wood and Mike Winger? I want to hear from you guys in the comments section. And if you guys want to see uh when I had Mike Winger at the Blessed God Summit, the conversation we had, we'll have that over here. If you want to pick up one of our Blessed God prayer journals, we'll have it over here, all right? I'll see you guys on the next one. Peace. We've been looking at the back-end analytics, and thankfully more of you guys who watch regularly are subscribed. We went from like 62% to only 58% of you guys now being subscribed. But why is there still 58% of you guys that watch regularly that are not subscribed? Make sure you hit that subscribe button. We've been hearing all kinds of crazy things about people getting unsubscribed, or people having their notifications turned off. Make sure you're subscribed. Make sure your bell notifications are on so you don't miss anything. It'd be amazing to get this number inverted. Only 40% of the people that watch aren't subscribed. All right? Hit that subscribe button., Mike Winger Goes NUCLEAR After These Threats, Ruslan KD, 01ky7v1vzdk6r0wan4zfqzhpkw.