Re: WPE v Automatic
đź”— **Source:** [Re: WPE v Automatic](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.437474/gov.uscourts.cand.437474.294.6_1.pdf)
> [!note]+ Document Notes
> # ⚖️ WP Engine v. Automattic — Dkt. 294.6: Exhibit — deposition scheduling stipulation (Mullenweg)
> **Case:** WPEngine, Inc. v. Automattic Inc., Matthew Mullenweg, WooCommerce Inc. & WordPress Foundation — N.D. Cal. No. 4:24-cv-06917-AMO (Judge Araceli MartĂnez-OlguĂn; discovery before Mag. J. Ajay S. Krishnan). Late-May-2026 discovery-phase filing (fact discovery closed May 14, 2026).
> **Filing:** Scheduling correspondence/stipulation · By: both sides
> ## Summary
> Sets the Mullenweg deposition for May 12–14 (Automattic 30(b)(6), WooCommerce 30(b)(6), and individual capacities), with WPE reserving rights to request additional days and a process for stipulating or briefing additional time by mid-May.
> ## Key points
> - Three-day Mullenweg deposition across three capacities.
> - Built-in mechanism for the additional-time dispute that became Dkt. 294.
> ## 🏛️ WordPress governance significance
> Shows the negotiated structure of deposing the project's central figure.
> ## đź”— Part of
> Exhibit to Dkt. 294.
Full text of this document omitted because this document is a PDF
[Download original file →](https://readwise.io/reader/document_raw_content/458640563), Re: WPE v Automatic, Rachel Herrick Kassabian, Orin Snyder, 01ksftrg68h73bd6g4ptt21gsy.