WordPress Almost Didn’t Happen  ## Metadata - Author: [[Rich Tabor]] - Full Title: WordPress Almost Didn’t Happen - Category: #articles - Document Note: --- tags: [WordPress, open-source, counterfactual] author: [Rich Tabor] source: [rich.blog] reference: [https://rich.blog/choosing-open/] date created: 2025-10-08 00:00 --- # 🏷️ Title: WordPress Almost Didn’t Happen ## 🧭 Table of Contents - [📝 Summary](#-summary) - [📖 Main Content](#-main-content) - [🗒️ Notes](#️-notes) - [📚 References](#-references) - [🗣️ Paraphrase](#️-paraphrase) - [📰 Newsletter](#-newsletter) - [✅ Action Items](#-action-items) - [🧪 Hypotheses](#-hypotheses) - [📊 Methodology](#-methodology) - [❓ Questions](#-questions) - [🔮 Future Research](#-future-research) - [💡 Implications](#-implications) - [🧠 Learning Styles Assessment](#-learning-styles-assessment) - [📊 Accessibility Assessment](#-accessibility-assessment) - [🌍 DEIB Assessment](#-deib-assessment) - [✅ Logical Validity](#-logical-validity) - [🛡️ DARVO Analysis](#-darvo-analysis) - [🎯 Conclusion](#-conclusion) ### 🔗 References - Include links cited in or relevant to the article. ## 📝 Summary - What happened. - The author reflects on a counterfactual: “What if Matt had joined Google instead of starting WordPress?” and argues small choices toward openness compound into web-scale impact. - Why it matters. - Choosing open ecosystems can shape control, ownership, and innovation on the web for decades. - Key stakeholders. - Open source maintainers, WordPress community, publishers, creators, and platforms. - Risks and tradeoffs. - Openness can face resourcing, governance, and sustainability challenges vs. closed, well-funded platforms. - Bottom line. - Individual choices to “choose open” reverberate; today’s decisions will define the web’s character twenty years out. ## 📖 Main Content - Core arguments (plain language) - One pivotal decision—Matt Mullenweg not joining a big tech company—enabled WordPress and its open ecosystem to flourish. - Openness enables shared ownership and wide participation, making “the internet feel more like ours.” - The web’s future depends on current builders choosing openness in products, governance, and licensing. - Context and terms - WordPress began from an open-source fork (b2/cafelog) and grew into a CMS powering a large share of the web. - “Choosing open” includes open licenses, transparent governance, and interoperable standards. - Uncertainties/contested claims - Counterfactual outcomes (what would have happened if Matt joined Google) are speculative but illustrative. ### 🗒️ Notes - “What if Matt had joined Google instead of starting WordPress?” - “The internet might have felt a little less like ours.” - The author highlights how “tiny choices… ripple out for decades.” - Open decisions today influence control, creativity, and economic opportunity across the web. - Call to action: Who is choosing open now, and what will that mean two decades from now? ## 📚 References - WordPress history overview (https://wordpress.org/about/history/) - b2/cafelog origin note by Mike Little (https://mikemcqy.com/wordpress-origin) - WordPress on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordPress) - Open Source Initiative: What is open source? (https://opensource.org/osd) ## 🗣️ Paraphrase - Paragraph A paraphrase. - If Matt Mullenweg had taken a job at a major tech firm, WordPress might never have existed, changing the openness of today’s web. - Paragraph B paraphrase. - Small, early choices in favor of open source can compound into widespread, long-term benefits for everyone online. ## 📰 Newsletter - WordPress almost didn’t happen. Rich Tabor reflects on how a single choice—to build openly rather than join Big Tech—helped the web “feel like ours.” This is a timely reminder as we evaluate licenses, governance, and ecosystems. - Resources: WordPress history (official), open-source basics (OSI), and community contributions: - WordPress history (https://wordpress.org/about/history/) - Open Source Definition (https://opensource.org/osd) - Plugins/themes to explore: - Gutenberg tooling and modern block themes. - Community: Consider local meetups and contributor days; small contributions compound. ## ✅ Action Items #### DevRel - Advocate “choose open” narratives with case studies and live demos showing interoperability. - Run workshops on open licensing and contribution workflows; office hours for new contributors. - Improve quickstarts/examples for block themes and plugin scaffolds. - Publish a content series mapping open decisions to measurable outcomes. - Launch moderated forums and contributor surveys; track funnel from first PR to maintainer. #### OSPO - Formalize contribution policies, decision rights, and lightweight charters. - Establish license compliance scanning and quarterly training. - Maintain vuln intake and embargo policy; sign releases and attest build provenance. - Track SBOMs, ownership, and freshness SLOs. - Offer office hours for legal and compliance questions; document guardrails. - Fund upstream dependencies; publish KPIs in executive reports. #### Community - Maintainers: roadmap clinics, release hygiene checklists. - Contributors: guided “first issue” rotations and pairing. - Sponsors: publish budgets and impact reports for transparency. - Ecosystem: incident drills and coordinated security disclosures. #### WordPress - Core: prioritize performance budgets, triage cadence, clear release criteria. - Core Performance: profiling plans, dashboards, bounties for hotspots. - Core AI: guardrails, eval sets, small pilots with public reports. - Core Program Team: recurring cross-team syncs and retros. - Mobile: offline UX improvements and telemetry reviews. - Playground: reproducible bug templates and education labs. - Community: meetup kits, speaker mentorship, WordCamp playbooks. - Training: lesson paths and certification pilots. - Marketing: narrative on openness; editorial calendar. - Support: SLAs and KB gap analysis. - Design: UX audits and design tokens. - Documentation: examples-first patterns and style guide. - Photos/TV: moderation/caption quality; submission guides. - Polyglots: translation sprints and glossary alignment. - Accessibility: audits cadence, issues heatmap. - Meta/.org: API reliability and contributor tooling. - CLI: command coverage and smoke tests. - Hosting: cross-host test checklists and telemetry. - Tide: scoring transparency and review loops. - Openverse: ingestion reliability and moderation. - Themes/Plugins: review throughput; mentoring and security liaisons. #### The WPCC - Fellowship tracks, microgrants, and maintainer stipends. - Governance clinics and documentation sprints. - Matched grants and milestone-based payouts with public ledgers. ### FAIR - Independence: local metadata and signature verification. - Policies: funding transparency, anti-capture covenants. - Productized governance: charters, operator agreements, scorecards. ## 🧪 Hypotheses - H1: Projects with open governance achieve greater ecosystem contribution growth over five years than closed peers. - H2: Open-licensed CMS adoption correlates with higher publisher independence metrics. - H3: Early investment in contributor onboarding increases long-term maintainer retention. - H4: Transparent roadmap rituals reduce time-to-fix for critical issues. ### 📊 Methodology - Comparative longitudinal study of open vs. closed CMS ecosystems (adoption, contributors, time-to-fix). - Surveys/interviews of maintainers on onboarding practices vs. retention. - Repository analytics (PR throughput, review latency, release cadence). ### ❓ Questions - Which present-day projects are making pivotal “choose open” decisions? - What governance patterns best scale contributor trust? - How do funding models affect openness and resilience? ### 🔮 Future Research - Counterfactual analyses of other major web platforms. - Empirical links between openness and market diversity/competition. - Sustainable funding models for volunteer-heavy ecosystems. ### 💡 Implications - Practice: adopt open governance and contribution guides. - Policy: support interoperability and open standards. - Security: formalize disclosure and signing. - Education: curricula on OSS literacy and licensing. - Funding: diversify mechanisms (grants, sponsorshi - Summary: What if Matt had joined Google instead of starting WordPress? The internet might have felt a little less like ours. In his… - URL: https://rich.blog/choosing-open/ What if Matt had joined Google instead of starting [WordPress](https://wordpress.org)? The internet might have felt a little less like ours. In his [recent post](https://ma.tt/2025/10/linkrot/), Matt mentioned *“How the internet might have turned out differently if I had taken that job, as my mom wanted me to (because they offered free food).”* Funny line. But also wild to think about. It’s incredible how much of the web traces back to one person deciding to build something open. I think about that sometimes. The tiny choices that ripple out for decades. Who’s choosing open now? And what will that mean twenty years from here? Some content could not be imported from the original document. [View content ↗](https://widgets.wp.com/likes/?ver=15.1-beta.2#blog_id=213949716&post_id=7060&origin=rich.blog&obj_id=213949716-7060-68e674a89e880), WordPress Almost Didn’t Happen, Rich Tabor, 01k723fg5nmye969qs6zfvfzvg.