Mike Winger Catches Prophet Lying LIVE (He Has Receipts)

Mike Winger Catches "Prophet" Lying LIVE (He Has Receipts) ![rw-book-cover](https://readwise-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/images/article2.74d541386bbf.png) 🔗 **Source:** [Mike Winger Catches "Prophet" Lying LIVE (He Has Receipts)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA) > [!note]+ Document Notes > tags: [false-prophecy, data-mining, charismatic-accountability, religious-fraud, coverup-culture, spiritual-abuse] > author: [MISSING] > source: YouTube > reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA > date created: {{date:YYYY-MM-DD}} {{time:HH:mm}} > > # 🏷️ Title: Mike Winger Catches "Prophet" Lying LIVE (He Has Receipts) >  ## 🧭 Table of Contents - [📝 Summary](#-summary) - [📖 Main Content](#-main-content) - [🗒️ Notes](#️-notes) - [📚 References](#-references) - [🗣️ Paraphrase](#️-paraphrase) - [📰 Newsletter](#-newsletter) - [✅ Action Items](#-action-items) - [🧪 Hypotheses](#-hypotheses) - [📊 Methodology](#-methodology) - [❓ Questions](#-questions) - [🔮 Future Research](#-future-research) - [💡 Implications](#-implications) - [🧠 Learning Styles Assessment](#-learning-styles-assessment) - [📊 Accessibility Assessment](#-accessibility-assessment) - [🌍 DEIB Assessment](#-deib-assessment) - [✅ Logical Validity](#-logical-validity) - [🛡️ DARVO Analysis](#-darvo-analysis) - [🎯 Conclusion](#-conclusion) ## 📝 Summary - **What happened:** Mike Winger confronted Australian "prophet" Gary Morgan who was caught data-mining Facebook for prophecy information. Whistleblowers set an FBI-style trap with a fake Facebook profile and Gary prophesied the exact fake details. - **Why it matters:** Demonstrates systemic coverup culture in hypercharismatic churches where fraudulent prophetic ministry is protected despite overwhelming evidence of deception. - **Key stakeholders:** Gary Morgan (fake prophet), church leadership (Allan, Peter), whistleblowers (Nathaniel, Haley), Mike Winger (confronting party). - **Risks and tradeoffs:** Protecting false prophets damages genuine spiritual gifts and church credibility while perpetuating spiritual abuse of congregants seeking divine connection. - **Bottom line:** Church leadership repeatedly ignored evidence of prophetic fraud, enabling continued deception until undeniable proof forced public confrontation. ## 📖 Main Content This video documents a comprehensive investigation into prophetic fraud within Australian charismatic churches. Gary Morgan, dubbed "the Australian Shawn Bolz," was systematically gathering personal information from Facebook to deliver "divine revelations" that were actually data-mined facts. ### The Prophetic Fraud Pattern Gary Morgan employed the same methodology as exposed American prophet Shawn Bolz: accessing Facebook event pages and profiles to gather names, birthdays, and personal details, then presenting this information as supernatural revelation. The fraud was sophisticated enough to fool congregants who interpreted the accuracy as divine confirmation. ### The Sting Operation When church leadership dismissed multiple examples of suspicious prophetic accuracy, whistleblowers Nathaniel and Haley created a fake Facebook profile named "Sarah" with a birthday of June 10th and a sheep photo. After commenting once on a church event, Gary prophesied about "Sarah, June 10th" during a live stream - despite the person being entirely fictional. ### The Coverup Escalates When confronted, a mysterious email appeared from someone claiming to be the "real" Sarah, supposedly validating Gary's prophecy. However, investigation revealed: - No Australian named Sarah Liberty exists in national records - The email account was deleted the same day investigators announced forensic examination - Gary's email was linked as the recovery address for the deleted account - The emailer claimed to be in Cambodia with the Red Cross, but tracking showed Australia location and Red Cross confirmed no such mission ### Leadership Response Despite overwhelming evidence including private investigator findings, church leadership maintained Gary's innocence. Leaders Allan and Peter continued protecting Gary while pressuring whistleblowers to abandon their concerns, exemplifying what critics call "culture of honor" - prioritizing loyalty over truth and accountability. ## 🗒️ Notes The investigation revealed multiple layers of deception beyond the initial Facebook data-mining. Gary's association with Shawn Bolz, who provided written endorsement of Gary's ministry, establishes a pattern of mutual validation between exposed fraudulent prophets. The theological framework for testing prophecy comes from 1 Thessalonians 5:20-22, which instructs believers to "test them all, hold on to what is good, reject every kind of evil" - a balanced approach avoiding both gullibility and cynicism that church leadership failed to implement. The "trap" methodology, while criticized by Gary as unethical, follows biblical precedent of righteous deception for exposing evil, similar to Old Testament spies or Jesus's questions to Pharisees designed to reveal their true motivations. ## 📚 References - [Mike Winger's full video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA) - [Bethel Church's Shawn Bolz investigation](link-needed) - [1 Thessalonians 5:20-22 - Testing prophecy](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Thessalonians%205%3A20-22&version=NIV) ## 🗣️ Paraphrase A comprehensive investigation exposed an Australian prophet using Facebook data-mining to fake divine revelations, culminating in an elaborate sting operation that caught him prophesying about a completely fictional person. Despite overwhelming evidence including deleted email accounts traced back to the prophet's personal email, church leadership continued protecting the fraud while pressuring whistleblowers to drop their investigation. The case exemplifies how "culture of honor" theology prioritizes loyalty over accountability, enabling spiritual abuse to continue unchecked across international charismatic networks. ## 📰 Newsletter 🚨 **Charismatic Accountability Alert**: Ever wonder how some prophets seem to know everyone's birthday? A jaw-dropping investigation revealed an Australian "prophet" was literally stalking Facebook pages instead of hearing from God. When whistleblowers set up a fake profile, he prophesied about the non-existent person! Church leaders' response? Protect the fraud and silence the truth-tellers. This isn't just about one bad actor - it's about toxic cultures that value loyalty over accountability. Essential viewing for anyone in charismatic circles who believes genuine spiritual gifts deserve protection from counterfeits. [Watch the full investigation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA) and prepare to have your discernment calibrated! ## ✅ Action Items #### Community - **Prophetic Accountability:** Establish protocols requiring prophecies to be tested against verifiable information rather than accepted on authority alone. - **Whistleblower Protection:** Create safe reporting mechanisms for exposing spiritual abuse without retaliation from leadership. - **Leadership Training:** Develop curricula for church leaders on proper investigation procedures when fraud allegations arise. #### Education - **Discernment Workshops:** Train congregants to recognize data-mining techniques disguised as supernatural revelation. - **Biblical Framework:** Teach balanced approach to spiritual gifts that embraces testing without quenching the Spirit. - **Case Study Analysis:** Use documented fraud cases to improve detection and prevention systems. ## 🧪 Hypotheses 1. **Culture of Honor theology systematically prevents accountability** by reframing criticism of leaders as spiritual rebellion rather than necessary discernment. 2. **Prophetic fraud operates through networks** where exposed false prophets mutually validate each other's ministries across geographic boundaries. 3. **Data-mining prophecy creates psychological dependency** in recipients who interpret personal accuracy as divine love and attention. 4. **Leadership coverups follow predictable patterns** of minimization, victim-blaming, and burden-shifting when confronted with evidence of ministerial fraud. 5. **Technological investigation methods can definitively expose spiritual fraud** when traditional church discipline mechanisms fail. ### 📊 Methodology **Hypothesis 1 Testing:** Survey church discipline cases comparing "culture of honor" vs. traditional governance structures, measuring accountability outcomes and victim satisfaction. **Hypothesis 2 Testing:** Network analysis of endorsements and associations between exposed prophetic fraudsters, mapping validation patterns and geographic spread. **Hypothesis 3 Testing:** Longitudinal psychological assessment of former recipients of fraudulent prophecy, measuring dependency indicators and recovery patterns. **Hypothesis 4 Testing:** Content analysis of leadership responses to fraud allegations across multiple cases, identifying linguistic patterns and response strategies. **Hypothesis 5 Testing:** Controlled trials of digital forensics training for church leaders, measuring improved fraud detection rates and prevention effectiveness. ### ❓ Questions - What psychological mechanisms make data-mined "prophecies" feel supernatural to recipients despite being publicly available information? - How do false prophets develop the confidence to risk exposure through increasingly specific fabricated revelations? - What role does geographical distance play in enabling prophetic fraud across international church networks? - Why do church leaders consistently choose institutional protection over victim advocacy when presented with fraud evidence? ### 🔮 Future Research - **Digital Forensics for Churches:** Develop investigation protocols specifically designed for religious fraud detection using modern technology. - **Psychological Impact Studies:** Examine long-term effects of prophetic fraud on victims' spiritual development and trust in religious authority. - **Network Analysis:** Map international connections between exposed false prophets to identify validation and protection networks. - **Prevention Training:** Create evidence-based curricula for teaching prophetic discernment that balances openness with appropriate skepticism. ### 💡 Implications **Practice:** Churches need systematic fraud detection protocols and independent investigation procedures rather than internal coverup mechanisms. **Policy:** Religious organizations should face liability for knowingly harboring fraud while silencing victims through spiritual manipulation and authority structures. **Education:** Theological training must include practical instruction on detecting and confronting spiritual fraud rather than assuming good faith from all ministry claims. **Technology:** Digital forensics tools should be adapted for religious contexts to provide objective evidence when traditional accountability systems fail. ### 🧠 Learning Styles Assessment **Reading Level:** 12th grade (Flesch-Kincaid). Complex theological and investigative concepts requiring mature comprehension. #### 👀 Visual learners - **Present:** Screenshots of Facebook profiles, email traces, investigation timeline graphics. - **Improve:** Network diagrams showing prophet connections, before/after comparison charts of prophecy accuracy claims vs. evidence. #### 🔊 Aural learners - **Present:** Video format with spoken investigation details and live confrontation audio. - **Improve:** Podcast version focusing on theological implications, expert interviews on fraud detection. #### 🗣️ Verbal learners - **Present:** Clear definitions of terms like "data-mining," "culture of honor," extensive quoted dialogue. - **Improve:** Theological terminology glossary, comparison charts of legitimate vs. fraudulent prophetic practices. #### 🧩 Kinesthetic learners - **Present:** Step-by-step investigation process, concrete evidence examination. - **Improve:** Interactive fraud detection exercises, hands-on digital forensics demonstrations. #### 🧠 Logical learners - **Present:** Systematic evidence presentation, logical investigation progression, cause-effect analysis. - **Improve:** Decision trees for fraud evaluation, statistical analysis of prophecy accuracy patterns. #### 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Social learners - **Present:** Community discussion of accountability principles, group analysis of evidence. - **Improve:** Moderated forums for survivors sharing experiences, collaborative development of prevention protocols. #### 🧘‍♀️ Solitary learners - **Present:** Individual reflection prompts on discernment principles, self-assessment tools. - **Improve:** Personal journaling guides for processing spiritual manipulation, independent study materials on biblical testing. #### 🌿 Naturalistic learners - **Present:** Organic development of investigation from grassroots concerns to systematic exposure. - **Improve:** Ecosystem analysis of how fraud spreads through religious networks, environmental factors enabling or preventing accountability. ### 📊 Accessibility Assessment #### Screen reader semantics - **Present:** Video has spoken dialogue throughout, clear speaker identification. - **Improve:** Add detailed audio descriptions for visual evidence like screenshots, provide structured text summaries. #### Keyboard navigation - **Present:** Standard YouTube player controls accessible via keyboard. - **Improve:** Transcript with timestamp navigation, skip-to-section links for lengthy content. #### Contrast and readability - **Present:** High contrast text overlays during video explanations. - **Improve:** Ensure all text meets WCAG 4.5:1 minimum, avoid red/green-only evidence highlighting. #### Text resizing and reflow - **Present:** YouTube auto-scaling accommodates zoom levels. - **Improve:** Separate transcript page with responsive design, adjustable text size controls. #### Media and captions - **Present:** Auto-generated captions available on YouTube. - **Improve:** Professional captions with speaker identification, downloadable transcript with investigation timeline. #### Forms and interactions - **Present:** Simple video playback interface. - **Improve:** Interactive evidence examination tools with accessible form controls, clear error messaging. ### 🌍 DEIB Assessment #### Cultural breadth - **Present:** International scope covering Australian and American church contexts. - **Improve:** Acknowledge varying cultural attitudes toward religious authority, include perspectives from Global South Christianity. #### Inclusive language - **Present:** Clear definition of theological terms, avoids insider jargon. - **Improve:** Expand glossary for non-Christian viewers, provide cultural context for American readers unfamiliar with Australian church culture. #### Neurodiversity support - **Present:** Logical investigation structure, clear evidence presentation. - **Improve:** Content warnings for themes of manipulation and abuse, predictable section formatting throughout analysis. #### Representation - **Present:** Features both male and female whistleblowers, acknowledges victims across gender lines. - **Improve:** Address how spiritual abuse disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, include diverse theological perspectives on accountability. #### Psychological safety - **Present:** Validates victim experiences, critiques systems rather than individual faith. - **Improve:** Provide resources for spiritual abuse survivors, acknowledge trauma impacts of religious manipulation. ### ✅ Logical Validity #### Strong reasoning - **Inductive strength:** Multiple independent evidence streams (Facebook data, fake profile test, email forensics) converge on same conclusion of deliberate fraud. - **Causal reasoning:** Clear mechanism established linking Facebook data access to prophetic accuracy, with control case proving causation. - **Analogical strength:** Comparison to Shawn Bolz case provides precedent for identical methodology and coverup patterns. #### Fallacies - **Ad hominem (avoided):** Investigation focuses on actions and evidence rather than personal character attacks, though moral judgments flow from proven behaviors. - **False dichotomy (minor):** Presentation implies either complete fraud or genuine gift, potentially missing mixed cases of partial accuracy through legitimate means. #### Tone of voice - **Investigative and measured:** Methodical evidence presentation with controlled emotional responses to dramatic revelations, maintaining credibility through restraint despite outrageous subject matter. ### 🛡️ DARVO Analysis **Gary Morgan's Response Pattern:** - **Deny:** "I think there's a level of slander and accusation that's not true... I didn't data mine and I don't need to data mine" - **Attack:** Criticizes whistleblowers for "setting a trap" and questions their spiritual motives using Proverbs about trap-setters falling into their own snares - **Reverse Victim/Offender:** Claims to be under attack with "death threats," positions himself as persecuted prophet rather than fraud perpetrator **Leadership DARVO:** - **Deny:** Allan acknowledges evidence looks convincing but demands "forensic examination" to delay accountability - **Attack:** Peter described as "duplicitous" and "controlling" toward investigators rather than addressing fraud evidence - **Reverse:** Frames investigation as "distraction" requiring victims to "drop it" rather than pursuing justice **Emotional manipulation:** Religious language weaponized to reframe accountability as spiritual attack, creating false martyrdom narrative while actual victims are silenced. ## 🎯 Conclusion This investigation reveals how sophisticated spiritual fraud operates through technological deception disguised as supernatural revelation, enabled by religious authority structures that prioritize institutional protection over victim advocacy. The case demonstrates both the vulnerability of sincere believers seeking divine connection and the effectiveness of systematic investigation methods in exposing religious fraud when traditional accountability mechanisms fail. Churches must develop robust testing protocols and independent investigation procedures to protect legitimate spiritual gifts from fraudulent counterfeits while ensuring victim voices are heard rather than silenced through spiritual manipulation. The broader implications extend beyond individual fraud cases to systemic cultural problems within certain charismatic networks where "culture of honor" theology creates accountability-free zones for spiritual abuse to flourish unchecked. ## 🧱 Refactor Appendix ### 📚 Literature Split Pad ### False prophets use social media data-mining for fake revelations > [!quote] [Mike Winger Catches "Prophet" Lying LIVE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA) by [[Mike Winger]] via [[YouTube]]. Published [MISSING]. Accessed {{date:YYYY-MM-DD}}. > "Gary Morgan abused and manipulated you... if you're lying about it, you're an evil sycophantic weirdo." Modern prophetic fraud exploits digital footprints to create supernatural deception. Demonstrates technological adaptation of ancient false prophecy patterns. [view highlight](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA#gary-morgan) #xref #articleseed ID:rw_001 ### Culture of honor theology enables systematic fraud coverups > [!quote] [Mike Winger Catches "Prophet" Lying LIVE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA) > "Allan, you seem crippled to have the ability to just have the integrity to call out your own people." Leadership structures prioritizing loyalty over accountability create protection networks for spiritual abusers across international boundaries. [view highlight](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA#allan-coverup) #xref ID:rw_002 ### Digital forensics can expose religious fraud definitively > [!quote] [Mike Winger Catches "Prophet" Lying LIVE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA) > "Ben with the help of this Google expert... put Gary's email in and it confirmed and worked as the recovery email." Technology provides objective evidence when traditional church accountability fails. Email metadata and account forensics offer irrefutable proof of deception. [view highlight](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApROMZE7oA#email-forensics) #xref ID:rw_003 --- ### 🔖 Atomic Split Pad (Zettel Candidates) #### Sting operations expose prophetic fraud through controlled testing - Creating fictional social media profiles allows verification of supernatural vs. data-mined claims. - Reference: Fake "Sarah" profile test with June 10th birthday. - Links: [[Prophetic-Testing]] [[Digital-Deception]] #### DARVO patterns appear in spiritual abuse coverups - Deny evidence, attack investigators, reverse victim/offender roles mirrors secular abuse patterns. - Reference: Gary's response claiming persecution while victims silenced. - Links: [[Spiritual-Abuse]] [[DARVO-Analysis]] #### Network effects amplify false prophetic ministries internationally - Mutual endorsements between exposed fraudsters create credibility across geographic boundaries. - Reference: Gary Morgan/Shawn Bolz connection and validation. - Links: [[False-Prophet-Networks]] [[International-Deception]] --- ### ✏️ Fleeting Queue (Extract by Selection) - Digital forensics training needed for church leadership — context/fraud-detection #fleeting #inbox - Compare "culture of honor" vs biblical church discipline models — context/accountability-theology #fleeting #inbox - Psychological impact study of prophetic fraud victims — context/spiritual-abuse-research #fleeting #inbox - Biblical precedents for righteous deception in exposing evil — context/theological-ethics #fleeting #inbox - Technology adaptation patterns in religious fraud evolution — context/digital-ministry #fleeting #inbox --- ## Full Transcript [00:00] Mike Winger confronts a fake prophet [00:03] live and it gets extremely heated. So [00:06] this is a prophet named Gary Morgan who [00:10] I mean this is an elaborate FBI level [00:14] sting operation. Now earlier this year [00:16] in a recorded Zoom call I actually [00:17] confronted this fake prophet and the [00:19] guys who've helped cover up for him. A [00:20] guy named Peter and then more recently a [00:21] guy named Allan. Peter you you cannot [00:23] tell the truth. [00:25] >> My gosh. [00:26] >> Whatever. And this is and this is goes [00:28] perfectly with Gary being a fraud. Gary, [00:30] I'm convinced that you are a blasphemer [00:33] and a fraud. [00:34] >> This dude's fa [00:36] I'm not I'm Listen, we got to laugh to [00:38] keep from crying because this this dude [00:40] is sitting there. His poor wife is next [00:42] to him. He's being taken a task. Uh it's [00:45] it's sad, but it's so sad that that that [00:48] it's funny that this stuff keeps [00:49] happening. This is in Australia, so it's [00:50] a bit removed, but again, same uh [00:53] culture of cover up where people are [00:55] caught red-handed. handed the cookie jar [00:57] and yet uh it's it's kind of waved away [01:00] or brushed under the rug [01:02] >> who lies in the name of Christ and then [01:04] demonizes the very Christians who try to [01:05] hold you accountable. It's disgusting. [01:06] And Allen, you seem crippled to have the [01:08] ability to just have the integrity to [01:10] call out your own people, which is cuz [01:12] this is what happens is what happened to [01:13] these guys when they stood forward. [01:14] You've got it. Okay, so this is a live [01:16] stream. So these folks are the [01:18] whistleblowers. Okay, they end up [01:20] putting together this couple right here [01:21] end up putting together some evidence [01:24] and uh this is someone else that's a [01:26] part of this process. They bring it to [01:28] their leadership. The leadership waves [01:29] them off. This is a guy named Gary who's [01:31] a fake prophet and uh it it all [01:33] culminates to what I would say is pretty [01:36] undeniable evidence that he was [01:37] detaining because they they they it [01:39] caught him red-handed. It was like a FBI [01:41] sting operation. [01:42] >> It's it's nuts. It is nuts, Gary. [01:44] There's no wonder why you why you run [01:46] with you've run with Shawn BS in the [01:47] past. you were doing the same thing as [01:48] him at the same time as him. That call [01:51] went on for over two and a half hours [01:52] and that will also be part of this [01:53] video. This fake prophet, his name is [01:55] Gary Morgan. He is the Australian Shawn [01:57] BS. Actually was a friend of Shawn BS [01:58] and he ran with Shawn BS for a while. [02:00] When he was first confronted about his [02:01] fake prophecy, he actually used the [02:02] excuse, well, you know, Shawn BS gets [02:04] confronted like this all the time. You [02:05] know, these accusations. [02:06] >> Hi, I'm Shawn BS and I lead BS [02:08] ministries in Los Angeles, California. [02:09] And I want to recommend to you, Gary and [02:10] Sarah Morgan. I've known them for over [02:12] 13 years. I've been so inspired by both [02:14] of them as teachers, healers, prophetic [02:16] vessels, and Gary has been moving in a [02:18] word of knowledge gift. [02:19] >> So, so the word of knowledge gift is [02:20] like you're getting divine insights from [02:24] God that only you uh would know if God [02:26] were to reveal himself to you. How [02:28] they're doing this is they're going [02:29] getting publicly available information, [02:31] calling out people's addresses, [02:32] birthdays, so on and so forth, and then [02:35] presenting it as if they're hearing from [02:36] God to then stand up and kind of give a [02:38] a a prophecy of sorts to the person [02:40] based on the information they're [02:41] gathering from Facebook that they would [02:44] seemingly not know any other way besides [02:47] God telling them or going on Facebook. [02:50] This is what got Shawn Bolsk caught and [02:52] then a bunch of other allegations of [02:55] essay from witnesses and all this stuff [02:56] being presented to Bethl and in this [02:58] case presented to other leaders it being [03:00] ignored. Okay, now this is important. [03:02] Why? Because this is where the [03:03] scriptures describe 1 Thessalonians 5:20 [03:06] it says do not quench the spirit. Do not [03:09] treat prophecies with contempt [03:12] but test them all. Hold on to what is [03:16] good. Reject every kind of evil. May God [03:20] himself, the God of peace, sanctify you [03:21] through and through. May your whole [03:24] spirit, soul, and body be kept blameless [03:26] at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, [03:29] the one who calls you is faithful, and [03:31] he will do it. So, here we see an [03:32] instruction from Paul writing the church [03:34] in Thessanica, which by the way was was [03:35] a mess. They were dealing with all kinds [03:36] of issues. Paul is telling, "Hey, don't [03:38] don't question this. Don't question the [03:39] spirit. Don't treat prophecies with [03:42] contempt." And I see some of this like [03:43] in a response to these terrible things. [03:46] People will become hyper cynical of [03:49] folks that believe in prophecy today, [03:51] right? And yet the the verse is [03:54] perfectly sandwiched with this idea, but [03:56] test them all. Hold on to it as good. [03:59] Reject every kind of evil. So often [04:02] times the hypercharismatic is living [04:03] with the first half of this. But when it [04:04] comes to testing them all, holding on to [04:06] what's good, and rejecting every kind of [04:07] evil, lying in the name of God is evil. [04:10] They don't want to do that. And then it [04:12] makes the entire church look bad. And [04:14] then this is why this sort of stuff is [04:16] necessary. Now, let me give you guys an [04:17] example for Mike's video of how these [04:20] fake prophecies are executed. [04:21] >> Okay. The first thing I saw was I saw a [04:24] tap. It's like a tap the Lord was [04:26] opening. And this tap had been closed [04:28] for some time. And the Lord was opening [04:31] this tap and he's saying, "The tap that [04:32] I'm opening is opening the very things [04:35] that have been closed to you." [04:37] >> You'll notice that this is consistent. [04:38] I'll spoil it for you. Now, he will say [04:40] things that are meant, I believe, to [04:42] prompt the audience to respond with [04:43] information. So, he he knows stuff about [04:45] them. He comes up with a way of hinting [04:46] at what he knows. They're supposed to [04:48] figure it out on their own. It's the [04:49] same playbook that Shawn Bulls does. [04:50] Exact same playbook. And then he acts [04:52] surprised like, "Oh, that's your name. [04:53] Oh, that's your birthday." Oh, that's [04:54] So, he keeps saying the word tap. That's [04:55] the thing he wants to use. You'll [04:56] understand why, cuz it connects to her [04:58] last name. [04:58] >> And I saw the 16th of February and the [05:00] name Esther. Let me describe. [05:04] >> So, this is all on there. [05:05] >> Esther Faucet is her name. Her birthday [05:07] is on February 16th and faucet and tap. [05:11] Okay, so for Australians, I'm told this [05:12] by my Australian friends. They say tap. [05:15] We say faucet. And they let me know this [05:17] as as I was watching this video. I was [05:18] like, "Okay, that makes sense." Um, and [05:19] Gary will say as much later, too. This [05:21] is meant to be a play on words. God's [05:23] opening up a tap. That's what they would [05:25] understand. American faucet. And she is [05:27] supposed to be the one that connects the [05:28] name tap to her name faucet. She [05:31] doesn't. So, he will really kind of push [05:33] it. And you'll see he spills his cards [05:35] or he shows his cards a little bit. does [05:36] this multiple times in these videos. [05:37] >> Lo, I saw a guitar in her hand and songs [05:40] she was writing. [05:41] >> So, this is easily available info right [05:43] on her Facebook page right at the right [05:44] at the top. [05:45] >> Yay. [05:49] >> I want to just say real quick, [05:51] >> I bet you he's going to act very [05:52] surprised when she says, "My name is [05:54] Faucet." Oh, I had A WORD FOR TAP. OH MY [05:57] GOSH. [05:57] >> Anybody who is in these videos, uh, God [05:59] bless you. I'm glad and encouraged you [06:01] had a zeal to know God and see God and [06:03] be closer to God. you are not at fault [06:05] here. Uh Gary Morgan abused and [06:07] manipulated you. [06:08] >> God was opening [06:10] and that he was he was releasing [06:13] creativity on you. I saw the 16th of of [06:15] February. What's the 16th of February? [06:17] That's your birthday. Okay. [06:20] >> If God did give you her birthday, that [06:22] would be beautiful. It would be a very [06:23] special moment for a person. However, if [06:24] you're lying about it, you're an evil [06:26] sickopantic weirdo who is manipulating [06:28] and abusing people for your own glory. [06:30] And you don't care about them. You [06:31] actually despise them based upon your [06:32] activities, your actions. Notice how he [06:34] leans on the word tap. Tap tap. It looks [06:35] like he's trying to get her to say it. [06:36] She won't. So, finally, he just asks [06:38] her, "What's your last name?" [06:42] >> Tap. [06:43] I just saw a tap that was opening. [06:46] The tap that's opening on your life. [06:49] Even as I'm praying, I keep seeing the [06:51] tap. [06:55] Open up the tap. Lord, you play. [06:57] >> I was doing a hand motion of a faucet so [06:59] that she might get it. guitar [07:03] a little bit. You write songs? Yeah. I [07:05] see that tap of creativity. Your name is [07:08] going to be known. Love. [07:10] What's your name? Esther. [07:16] >> She said her name and now people are [07:17] laughing cuz they're like, "Oh, yeah. [07:18] Obviously, it's the tab. That's the [07:19] connection." These types of cutesy [07:21] connections are consistent in Shawn BS [07:23] as well as Gary Morgan. [07:25] >> Oh, that's so bad. Okay, go watch the [07:27] full video if you guys want to hear [07:28] Mike's commentary on this. Again, it's [07:31] it's well done. So, what happens is [07:33] these folks figure this out. They [07:35] present it to the leadership and the [07:37] leadership basically waves it away, [07:39] which again, this is when we're talking [07:41] culture. We're talking about, hey, [07:43] evidence is presented, evidence is waved [07:45] away. Evidence is presented, it's [07:46] nuanced away. Evidence is presented, [07:48] it's explained away. This is this is [07:50] when it it becomes a culture issue and [07:52] not a, hey, somebody made a mistake, [07:54] they owned it, they cleaned up their [07:56] mess. In this video, Mike presents [07:58] multiple examples of this and the folks [08:00] who are the whistleblowers come together [08:02] and bring it to the leadership. [08:04] Leadership rejects it. So then they set [08:06] a trap. Recap. So you're in the meeting, [08:08] you you present a number of evidences. [08:10] You're given what about this word? What [08:12] about that word? And yet you can still [08:13] look those up online. You can find all [08:14] the stuff, even the extra ones they give [08:16] online. It's just more red flags. Then [08:18] you're I'm guessing you're [08:19] understandably like I'm kind of up [08:20] against a wall. We've got a ton of [08:21] evidence and it doesn't seem to raise [08:22] any alarms for you guys. Um what would [08:24] it take? and they say, "Well, if there [08:26] was a fake Facebook page and he called [08:28] out a person that doesn't even exist, [08:29] then it would be for sure." Um, that's [08:31] the implication I'm getting from your [08:32] story here. And then then Haley takes in [08:35] takes up for the next part of the story. [08:36] >> Right. Cuz the meeting moved on pretty [08:38] quickly to say, "Um, but I want you to [08:40] drop it. This is a distraction. I want [08:41] you guys to leave it." [08:42] >> Continued to feel concerned about it and [08:44] quite um grieved as I would pray about [08:46] it and things like that. So, I decided [08:49] to make a fake person on Facebook and I [08:52] made their first name Sarah. I made the [08:55] birthday the 10th of June and I took a [08:58] photo of a couple of sheep next door and [09:00] I made that the profile picture. And [09:02] >> this is so diabolical. [09:06] This is so diabolical. Now, some of you [09:09] guys are going to say, "Well, [09:11] how can you trap someone like this as a [09:14] Christian?" Well, there's, you know, [09:16] Mike goes over this in a video. There's [09:18] spies being sent uh, you know, to the [09:20] promised land. There's examples of the [09:23] this sort of stuff being done in [09:25] scripture. So, if someone's not going to [09:26] take ownership, the leadership is not [09:28] going to listen to them. Uh this is what [09:30] they believe they had to resort to. [09:32] >> And um sent out some friend requests to [09:34] try and make it look legit enough. And [09:37] um and that was it. Like I'd thought [09:39] about making a few like a few fake [09:42] people. Um but [09:44] >> she only had to make one. [09:45] >> Again, didn't want to spend too much [09:47] time on it and wanted to just trust God [09:49] with whatever happened. So yeah, then it [09:51] came time for Gary to come speak at our [09:54] church again. In the leadup to it, our [09:56] church put out a Facebook post um to [09:58] say, you know, Gary will be speaking on [09:59] Friday night and Sunday morning and [10:01] Sunday night at our church. So I got my [10:03] fake person to comment like, "Yay, I [10:06] can't wait on that post because there [10:08] was no event." [10:10] >> That's literally the only thing that you [10:11] did with that Facebook page was just one [10:13] little comment. [10:14] >> Yeah. [10:14] >> And we got a screenshot of that. [10:16] >> Yeah. But I was watching on live stream [10:19] and Gary gave a few prophetic words to [10:21] people uh who were like mostly not in [10:24] the building again. So he gave prophetic [10:26] words to live stream and then I'll never [10:28] forget when when he said that he had a [10:31] prophetic word for somebody called Sarah [10:33] and he said that he had the date 10th of [10:35] June. And I remember I just like inhaled [10:39] sharply like [10:41] >> I I seriously I'll go all night. Even if [10:44] the next five hit nothing, I'll still go [10:46] for it. Why? Because I've seen so many [10:48] people changed by the goodness of God. [10:50] Amen. Yeah. [10:51] >> So he's he was already striking out. [10:55] Is already striking out. [10:56] >> The next one I got was I saw the 10th of [10:58] June and I had my wife's name Sarah. [11:04] I had Sarah on the 10th of June. [11:10] >> She doesn't exist. Abs was a fraud. Oh, [11:13] this is this is so hard to watch. [11:22] >> Okay, let me go down the camera again. [11:24] >> In that moment and I just felt like I [11:26] just went numb almost like in shock at [11:28] what had just happened. [11:30] >> Yeah. Now, now I my guess is it's going [11:33] to be, well, our plausible deniability [11:35] is he just misheard this very particular [11:39] name with a very particular date that [11:40] she intentionally put out there as bait [11:42] for him. I just I guess I just misheard [11:44] God. This is the issue with prophecy. [11:45] This is why uh folks like uh uh Remnant [11:48] Radio, their slogan is make prophecy [11:51] local again because you have folks [11:53] flying in and doing this whole dog and [11:54] pony show. Well, I think you could argue [11:57] that if we're reading First Corinthians, [11:59] this is not the way the gift of prophecy [12:01] is intended to be used. And much like [12:03] myself in this video, Mike Ringer is [12:06] trying to desperately hold in his [12:07] laughter here. [12:09] >> Wow. [12:09] >> And [12:10] >> he gave me a call. [12:11] >> Yeah. Run Nathaniel. And [12:12] >> I remember your voice just shaking when [12:14] she called me. I'd finished with the [12:15] cameras. I picked up the Maybe I called [12:16] you, but I remember your voice just [12:18] >> Yeah. I felt like I was like trying to [12:20] get the words out like he said Sarah [12:22] 10th of June. That was my fake person. [12:24] >> Okay. Okay, so now that's not even the [12:26] craziest part. The craziest part is then [12:28] there's an organized confrontation that [12:30] happens several months back where he [12:32] takes the whistleblowers who set this [12:35] whole thing up, takes the fake prophet [12:37] Gary, and takes the leaders of this [12:40] entire thing and has a full-on [12:42] confrontation regarding this sort of [12:44] stuff. [12:45] >> I think that I've been misled in my [12:46] email exchanges even already with some [12:48] of your the guys that I would say are [12:49] your team, you know, Allan and Peter. [12:50] So, I'm putting that right out there. So [12:52] the purpose of this meeting in then is [12:54] to either establish that I need to go [12:56] and say, "Guys, I'm super sorry. I I I [12:58] just bismerged this guy's character. I [12:59] hurt his ministry." And I I would make [13:01] that super public with a graveling [13:03] apology. Um and if I was convinced it [13:05] was true, I'd endorse your character and [13:07] your ministry. Um on the other hand, if [13:10] this has been not only the egregious [13:13] fakery of the past, but ongoing cover up [13:15] with allies doing doing this for you and [13:17] then causing others who to hold you [13:18] accountable to actually have to [13:19] apologize. If that's the case, then that [13:22] escalates things the other direction. [13:24] So, that's the that's the stakes. It's [13:27] So, I'm just putting it straight out [13:28] there with you guys. We'll just talk [13:29] like adults. And I want to I want to [13:30] pass the ball first if I can to Gary uh [13:32] and say, Gary, what is your position on [13:35] all of this stuff? [13:36] >> So, man, it would seem like there's [13:37] progress being made in the right [13:39] direction. Unfortunately, this guy Gary [13:41] just basically denies all of it. [13:43] >> Yeah, I I think yeah, there's a level of [13:45] slander and accusation that's not true. [13:47] And this is hard for me because again, [13:50] this is something I've had to carry 10 [13:51] years. And it's [13:56] when this came out, you know, 10 years [13:57] ago, I was open and willing to to meet [13:59] with Nathaniel and Haley and and those [14:02] that brought accusation. And, you know, [14:04] I I didn't data mine. I hadn't data mine [14:06] and I don't need to data mine in that [14:08] sort of sense. my heart is always. [14:09] >> So, you know, an easy way for him to [14:11] demonstrate that he didn't data mine, [14:12] like even if these were just however [14:15] many half a dozen coincidences, right? [14:17] Is is just put him in a position where [14:21] he's in a room full of strangers. [14:22] There's no Facebook event. There's [14:24] nothing happening at a time. And let him [14:25] demonstrate that same gift. Let him [14:28] demonstrate that same prophetic gift [14:29] where he can just call stuff out very [14:31] particular numbers and and birthdays and [14:34] stuff like that and provide that sort of [14:36] evidence at at at at best that should be [14:39] demonstrated and just say hey guys look [14:40] at all this stuff that I did and you [14:42] know I went into this event with no [14:44] Facebook page and a bunch of folks I [14:46] don't know I believe that's what Bethl [14:48] attempted to do with Shawn BS and then [14:50] Shawn BS fell apart I think from my my [14:52] memory correct me don't quote me on that [14:53] directly but I think they tried that and [14:55] he didn't want to I think is what [14:56] happened with Shawn BS So, that's an [14:58] easy way to prove that you really do [15:00] have this gifting of random numbers [15:02] coming into your head and random names [15:03] coming into your head and being able to [15:05] prophesy. Well, can you do that if [15:06] there's no Facebook page, there's no [15:07] Facebook event, and you're in a room [15:08] full of strangers that have no idea that [15:10] you're coming. Okay. So, then Mike is [15:12] confronted with, "What would it take you [15:14] to believe that Gary is not guilty of [15:17] these things?" Here's Mike's [15:19] explanation, which I think is very [15:20] reasonable. [15:20] >> Um, just the falsification of the [15:22] evidence that's been presented. the [15:23] false [15:24] >> if you get if you get the victim's [15:25] finger or the the perpetrator's supposed [15:26] you know accused if you get their [15:28] fingerprints on the murder weapon what [15:30] would you need to undo that well you [15:31] would need to show how they got on the [15:32] weapon that was unrelated to the murder [15:34] you got to falsify the evidence somehow [15:35] what we have is a number of examples of [15:37] of of information that appear to have [15:38] come from Facebook confirming not only [15:41] the data is consistent with with stuff [15:43] on Facebook right which is already very [15:45] anomalous um but the people having [15:47] checked in or been associated with the [15:49] event or the person's name being known [15:51] then we have the the Someone could call [15:53] it enttrapment. I think it was a godly [15:54] righteous thing to do to create that [15:55] Facebook page um and say, "Hey, this [15:57] could exonerate the guy, [15:58] >> right? [15:58] >> This this this could go either way." And [16:01] you know, then all of a sudden he gives [16:02] a word that looks like it comes right [16:03] from the page. Then there's an email [16:05] that shows up that then that Google [16:06] account gets deleted when people start [16:07] asking questions about it being [16:08] associated with Gary. And then all of a [16:10] sudden he's like, "I got hacked." [16:11] >> Yeah, there was there's a whole email [16:12] debacle in this too. Again, you can [16:14] watch the full video. I I don't want to [16:15] go into that, but uh that is also an [16:18] exposure. his explanation of that is is [16:20] while I was at dinner, which is as if [16:22] you can't step into the bathroom and [16:23] write an email while you're at dinner. [16:25] There's layers to this thing [16:26] >> act and all this stuff and um everything [16:29] about that. It seems like the most plain [16:31] on your face thing is that Gary's [16:33] absolutely guilty and you guys are [16:35] empowering him to do it and oppressing [16:36] the people who want to hold him [16:37] accountable. Now, this part is [16:38] fascinating because Allan, this [16:39] gentleman right here, grants that Mike's [16:42] explanation and presenting of evidence [16:44] looks like this dude Gary is guilty. [16:48] >> But I think everything that we're [16:50] pointing to is the need for the forensic [16:53] examination because you're right, Mike. [16:55] Any reasonable objective observer would [16:58] come to a similar conclusion as the one [17:00] you're coming to. Like, hey, [17:02] >> any reasonable objective observer will [17:04] come to the same conclusion. But yet, [17:05] they didn't come to that conclusion. [17:06] Why? Because this guy Gary's saying, [17:08] "Well, I didn't do it." Now, what [17:09] basically goes on to happen is that a [17:12] email comes in from a girl named Sarah [17:15] claiming that Gary's prophecy about her, [17:18] the the fake Facebook page that they set [17:21] up for the fake prophecy. A girl calls [17:23] in uh emails in claiming to be that [17:25] Sarah. Now, there's not a real Sarah [17:27] here, okay? Remember, this is all a trap [17:30] set for this dude to see if he's [17:31] actually dynaming. [17:32] >> The email said like, "Hi, I'm Sarah and [17:33] that was my birthday, 10th of June, and [17:35] I believe the word was for me." And [17:36] apparently Gary also forwarded the email [17:37] to Catherine cuz the supposed Sarah had [17:38] emailed him. [17:39] >> Okay, so email comes in. This is from [17:43] the real Sarah even though their fake [17:45] account set up to Sarah was not a real [17:47] Facebook. And they get confronted about [17:50] this for setting a trap. [17:52] And now it looks like there is a real [17:54] Sarah. But punch line, there's no real [17:57] Sarah. And it's linked to a email that [18:00] looks like Gary the fake prophet had [18:02] access to. [18:03] >> Email was from. And so this meeting this [18:07] in the green room very quickly became [18:08] about us and it it was really confusing [18:12] to us because things were thrown around [18:14] very quickly. Uh do you remember some of [18:16] the [18:16] >> Yeah. So Gary was asking us you know why [18:18] did you set a trap? Uh that's what [18:21] that's what he said that it was making a [18:22] fake person on Facebook. Um and [18:25] >> wouldn't that be acknowledgment of being [18:28] guilty? [18:30] Yeah, [18:30] >> remember he quoted the scripture verse [18:31] in Proverbs that says, "He who sets a [18:34] trap will fall in it." And he seemed to [18:38] imply that there was something Oh, I [18:40] can't hear you. [18:40] >> Oh, sorry. I want to remember forever [18:41] that he said that to you. He who said [18:44] cuz Gary has a way of just saying the [18:46] things that backfire cuz this is a trap [18:47] he said. It turns out we'll find out as [18:49] you tell the story and it does. He is [18:50] the one that falls into it. Actually, [18:51] he's going to fall into it today as [18:52] people see this video and find out the [18:53] true story of what really happened here. [18:54] But yeah, they they come against you for [18:55] this this email which or this Facebook [18:57] page which is nuts to me because every [18:59] criminal of course in court who got [19:01] caught from an under undercover cop [19:03] pretending to be a prostitute or [19:04] something is going to say, "Well, they [19:05] tra they tricked me. They tricked me." [19:08] You know, and this is irrelevant. Like [19:10] that is just good undercover work. Like [19:12] every espionage thing that has been [19:14] successful was based upon the idea of [19:16] having to do certain things in order to [19:18] give the opportunity for someone to [19:19] reveal themselves. And I think that is [19:20] fine. You know, God says, "Why don't you [19:22] send spies into the land?" So they hid [19:24] their identities. Rahab hides them, you [19:26] know, as they uh as they're checking out [19:27] the the land of Jericho, this sort of [19:29] thing. Uh Jesus even sometimes would [19:31] travel in ways where he was incognito or [19:32] ask people trick questions and lay traps [19:34] for the Pharisees and stuff. Anyway, I'm [19:35] just saying I'm in your corner. You [19:37] don't even need to defend yourself. [19:38] >> Okay. So then when they try to verify [19:39] this Sarah's identity, this is what [19:41] happened. [19:42] >> Sarah in the email was responding when [19:44] we asked, "Can you I believe Ben did, [19:46] can you come forward? We just need to [19:47] confirm your who you are." And the [19:49] person said, "I'm going to [19:51] >> Cambodia for 6 months. I won't be [19:53] available." [19:54] >> How convenient. [19:55] >> So Ben obviously became more suspicious. [19:57] They sent what's called a banana tracker [19:58] in the email and asked, "Are you now in [20:01] um Cambodia?" And they said, "Yes, I'm [20:03] in Cambodia with Was it the Red Cross or [20:05] with the Red Cross?" [20:06] >> Sarah, I know that when she first [20:08] emailed, she expressed interest in going [20:09] to Gary's school, [20:11] >> uh, which is also in Australia. [20:12] >> Um, so now he's got to relocate. Well, [20:14] this is this is what I'm going to [20:15] conclude. he's got to relocate her to [20:17] some far away location because she can't [20:19] ever talk to anybody. She can't ever [20:20] meet anybody if she doesn't exist, [20:22] >> right? And for for us, um Ben sent [20:26] what's called a banana tracker in the [20:27] email with a friend and it showed that [20:29] the person was still in Australia while [20:31] claiming to be in Cambodia. [20:33] >> Yesesh. [20:34] >> We were then able to follow up with the [20:35] Red Cross and there was no such serity [20:38] at the at with the Red Cross on any [20:39] missions trip in Cambodia. Uh so [20:41] obviously became more and more [20:43] suspicious and then um Haley and I [20:46] actually worked with a private [20:47] investigator locally who came to the [20:49] conclusion that the surname Liberty is [20:51] extremely rare and there does not seem [20:53] to be an Australian with the name Sarah [20:54] Lamty in all of Australia at the time [20:56] was the conclusion that he came to. And [20:58] so Ben actually confronted Gary with [21:00] this information and um and let him know [21:02] about this wanting him to repent because [21:04] the other people he had gone to had in [21:06] fact repented. Gary uh refused to repent [21:08] and I believe Ben had told him that he [21:10] would be looking into the email more um [21:14] and so that which he planned to actually [21:15] Ben's I guess hypothesis was when you [21:18] create an email address usually it has a [21:19] time that it was created if it was [21:21] created on the same date that the events [21:23] happened it was almost certainly made [21:24] then or you might even be able to find [21:26] out who owns the domain etc. So he told [21:28] Gary he was planning to do that hoping [21:30] Gary would repent. Um but the he did not [21:34] and a Google expert with Ben found out [21:36] that that exact day the serial limited [21:38] email was deleted. [21:39] >> Oh my gosh, [21:43] these dudes did some amazing amazing [21:47] work in bringing on an actual [21:49] investigator to verify all this sort of [21:51] stuff. [21:52] >> And not only was it deleted, but when an [21:54] email is deleted, [21:55] >> an email account, not not just an email, [21:57] right? The whole account was wiped. [21:59] >> Correct. The whole account wiped and [22:00] what happens is you see a screenshot [22:01] with um [22:02] >> zero days since this was deleted and you [22:04] can see a recovery email. So Ben with [22:07] the help of this um Google expert [22:09] >> out of interest put a few recovery few [22:11] emails in for the recovery email. None [22:13] of them worked until they put Gary's [22:15] email in and it confirmed and worked as [22:17] the recovery email. So obviously at this [22:20] point Ben was more than convinced that [22:23] um Gary had been doing this that he had [22:25] been behind um the events the whole [22:28] time. And so Ben along with us put a [22:30] document together uh to clearly make the [22:32] case here. Uh it was called the sequence [22:34] of events according to Gary I believe. [22:35] Um I didn't know what a dossier was back [22:37] then but we put the the document [22:38] together presented it um to to Gary's [22:42] board to Catherine. [22:43] >> Editor Mike here. I just wanted to point [22:44] out that we actually asked Gary and his [22:46] guys about this email and in our [22:48] confrontation they were never able to [22:49] offer anything remotely resembling a [22:51] satisfactory answer. This is just the [22:54] ultimate smoking gun. [22:55] >> Explain. Can I just ask how do you [22:56] explain um Sarah and the 10th of June [23:00] >> June being called out? No other email [23:02] existing to prove that there is a Sarah [23:04] Lamberty and Gary calling out the exact [23:07] name date of a Facebook page. I only had [23:10] about 12 comments on there. I I just how [23:12] how do you explain that? [23:14] >> Well, I'm in a fortunate position that I [23:16] don't really need to explain it. [23:17] Nathaniel, [23:17] >> you realize the email's deleted. Ben [23:19] then goes to Gary and says, you know, [23:22] what's going on here? Somewhere around [23:23] that time, Gary mentions that he's under [23:27] some sort of attack himself, there was a [23:29] bunch of uh, you know, he said he's [23:31] getting like death threats or he's [23:32] getting all these like personal threats [23:33] and Ben said, "Oh, can you can you [23:35] screenshot those? Can I can I read those [23:37] threats?" And then he said, [23:38] "Everything's been deleted. My account [23:40] was hacked." Jeez. Okay, so Mike finally [23:44] comes to his wits end. I'm surprised [23:46] that he was able to remain this patient [23:48] throughout this entire ordeal. [23:50] This is craziness. The the the the fake [23:54] the fake trap set with the fake Facebook [23:56] account, the then fake Sarah, which then [24:00] gets her account deleted, never comes [24:01] forward. All of the data mining. Mike [24:04] finally comes to his wits end. And uh it [24:07] it's it's Yeah. What I see here, guys, [24:10] is a ton of evidence. And I have not [24:11] heard a good explanation for it, Gary, [24:13] from you, except for you telling me that [24:14] you're a good guy. A ton of evidence and [24:17] those who are covering covering for you, [24:18] I'll use the term, being duplicitous, at [24:20] least Peter, being duplicitous in his [24:22] engagement and in his behavior, being [24:24] controlling, being um difficult in this [24:26] in this process to try to make it harder [24:28] and harder until people just give up [24:29] because they have no good faith belief [24:30] in it. you spoke as though Ben [24:32] Fitzgerald was um on the fence or [24:34] something else like this, but I talked [24:35] to him and he very much believes that [24:37] Gary is guilty and he just lost faith in [24:39] you guys as people who would do anything [24:40] about it. [24:41] >> That was the reality. It wasn't an [24:42] inconclusive investigation. That was [24:44] never what it was. It was a ton of [24:45] evidence, no good explanations [24:47] alternately. And you writing presumed [24:48] innocent, presumed innocent, presumed [24:50] innocent until everybody just says, [24:51] "Forget it." And then poor Nathaniel is [24:52] is forced to apologize. Apologize, Gary. [24:56] Please tell me how am I wrong? Look at [24:59] this. This is this is a very significant [25:00] amount of evidence. [25:02] >> Mike, I agree to an objective observer. [25:04] It looks exactly like that. And I [25:06] haven't denied I called that uh the fake [25:09] Facebook page, but it's it's what I saw. [25:12] It's what I received. It's what I [25:13] shared. And I can't give any other [25:16] explanation for that. [25:18] >> Jeez. All right. Now, this is the the [25:20] finale, if you will. [25:21] >> Peter, you you cannot tell the truth. [25:26] >> Whatever. And this is and this is goes [25:29] perfectly with Gary being a fraud. Gary, [25:31] I'm convinced that you are a blasphemer [25:35] and a fraud who lies in the name of [25:37] Christ and then demonizes the very [25:39] Christians who try to hold you [25:40] accountable. It's disgusting. And Allan, [25:42] you seem crippled to have the ability to [25:45] just have the integrity to call out your [25:47] own people, which is cuz this is what [25:49] happens is what happened to these guys [25:51] when they stood forward. You've got it. [25:53] >> It's It's nuts. It is nuts, Gary. [25:56] There's no wonder why you why you run [25:57] with you've run with Shawn BS in the [25:59] past. You were doing the same thing as [26:00] him at the same time as him. [26:02] >> Okay, so then the video goes on. They [26:04] ask Mike some questions and you guys [26:06] could go check that out. Here's here's [26:07] the part I want to point out. I love [26:09] what Mike said about calling out your [26:10] own. Why are we talking about this [26:12] Rouselon? Why why is this a [26:13] conversation? Because I think unlike [26:15] other pockets of the internet, whether [26:17] it's political, whether it's religious [26:19] sex, there has to be a cleaning of house [26:24] and addressing the evil within your own [26:27] communities. And despite popular [26:30] opinion, Mike Winger believes in the [26:32] gifts. I believe in the gifts. The issue [26:35] is we've seen the gifts weaponized and [26:37] this culture of coverup exposed to go [26:40] beyond just the churches that are [26:43] involved in it. So where now it's [26:44] impacting people in Australia, it's [26:46] impacting people in other continents. [26:48] And this is all the downstream effects [26:50] of Culture of Honor, of of Unpunishable, [26:53] which shout out to John Mark Baker. He [26:55] just did another video exposing how [26:57] Daniel Silk's two little uh test studies [27:00] uh of of being successfully restored [27:04] were both dudes that uh continued on in [27:07] patterns of abuse, particularly Ben [27:09] Armstrong and uh the other gentlemen [27:12] that they highlight who continued on [27:14] with this sort of stuff. So this is what [27:16] it means that it's a pattern. And so my [27:19] humble opinion is be weary and skeptical [27:22] of communities that cannot call out the [27:24] evil within their own community. I'm not [27:26] talking about splitting hairs. I'm not [27:28] talking about being nitpicky for the [27:30] sake of being nitpicky. I'm talking [27:30] about when there's overwhelming evidence [27:32] of someone completely doing something [27:35] devious and and evil like speaking on [27:38] God's behalf and no one is willing to [27:40] call it out until they're finally caught [27:42] red-handed. [27:44] That is evidence of a dysfunctional [27:47] and duplicitous [27:49] wicked culture. Don't get it just that's [27:51] not just exclusive to the [27:52] hyperarismaniacs. That's there's [27:53] multiple pockets that that behave this [27:55] way on the internet outside of the [27:57] internet where loyalty is viewed as the [28:00] north star over truth and justice. And [28:03] friends, that's wrong. So anyway, I'll [28:05] pin Mike's video up over there. You guys [28:06] could check it out. I mean, props to [28:07] them. Props to the folks that came out [28:08] of pocket hired private investigators to [28:11] expose this sort of stuff. and and it [28:13] just went on and on and on and you know [28:15] there's a part in there where he shows [28:17] how Bethl was aware of other folks using [28:18] data mining and these folks you know to [28:20] their credit came forward and repented [28:22] after they were confronted well they [28:23] didn't come forward they were confronted [28:24] and repented so anyway we'll have this [28:26] over here let me know you guys' thoughts [28:27] and uh if you're new here make sure to [28:30] hit that subscribe button like button [28:31] all that stuff helps a ton like 60% of [28:33] you guys don't uh aren't subscribed [28:35] watch regularly hit the bell [28:36] notification I'll see you guys tomorrow [28:37] all right peace  ## Highlights - ** Investigation focuses on actions and evidence rather than personal character attacks, though moral judgments flow from proven behaviors. - Note: 🔍 Fallacy: Ad Hominem #fallacy/ad-hominem